My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (IN OPPOSITION)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:11:19 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 10:30:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Mike Tardif < <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 9:26 AM <br />To: eComment <br />Cc: Iglesias, Cecilia; Angie Cano; Chris Schmidt; Dale Helvig; Pulido, Miguel <br />Subject: Council meeting Feb. 5, 2019 - Agenda Item 75E - 2525 N. Main St. Development <br />Council meeting Feb. 5. 2019 - Agenda Item 75E - 2525 N. Main St. Development <br />I am opposed to the proposed development at 2525 N. Main St. <br />The bulk and density of it is too large and will negatively impact the Park Santiago neighborhood. <br />Additionally, according to the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the Planning Commission's denial of this proposed <br />development is final. <br />DIVISION 3. - DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL <br />Sec. 41-674. - Appeal. <br />Any person aggrieved by a determination of the director of planning and development services pursuant <br />to section 41-673 may appeal such determination to the planning commission, which may then approve, <br />conditionally approve, or disapprove the plan subject to the same standards and limitations as apply to the <br />director of planning and development services under this division. The decision of the planning <br />commission shall be final. <br />Additionally, I did not see in the Staff report that the developer filed an appeal as required. <br />If nothing else, please consider reducing the project by 30% density— according to Alternate no. 2 of the EIR. <br />Thank you, <br />Mike Tardif <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />31. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.