My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:38:42 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 11:32:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dale Helvig <br /> <br /> <br />OTHER AREAS OF CONCERN (continued) <br />7. MASS TRANSIT. The project is touting proximity to mass transit (nearest northbound pickup is <br />0.4 miles). The project is touting proximity to the freeway. What transportation mode of do you <br />think will be used by the residents that need to earn $80-$152K per year to afford this units? <br />It won't be the bus. Traffic will be a nightmare! Parking will be a nightmare! <br />8. ENVISION MAP. Still can't believe this is even being mentioned. The Envision Map is not an <br />approved City document. A parcel of land that is located across the street from 2525, and is less <br />than 8000 square feet, is also listed as a site for "Highrise (unlimited density)". The applicant <br />assumed a risk when he based his purchase on a draft document. The map clearly stated: <br />"NOTE: "The map represents a conceptual effort [bolded for emphasis] and its contents are in <br />a draft format and do not represent any formal efforts to rezone or redesignate properties <br />shown. [bolded for emphasis] " <br />This map is no longer available, but it did provide a fair warning to anyone wishing to use the map. <br />9. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. It is said in the reports that architectural styles of single-family homes <br />often do not translate well to multi -storied buildings. Orange Architects said this is true unless <br />the scale of the project is reduced. <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.