My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:38:42 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 11:32:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2525 North Main Street <br />January 14, 2019 <br />Page 22 <br />Impacts to Utilities <br />Sections 4.13 and 4.14 of the Draft EIR analyzed the impacts of the project on water supply, <br />wastewater, drainage, water quality, and energy. Technical reports including a Water Supply <br />Assessment, Sewer Analysis and Hydrology Report were prepared for the project. As proposed <br />the project would result in a less than significant impact to utilities and services. <br />Noise <br />Section 4.8 of the Draft EIR analyzed noise impacts related to construction operations and <br />operational noise from HVAC equipment, parking facilities, trash removal and use of the outdoor <br />open space. Based on the SAMC noise standards the project would not general noise levels that <br />would exceed noise standards. To mitigate construction noise two mitigation measures are <br />proposed, one to require a 50 -foot buffer along the east property line for large mobile <br />construction equipment and installation of a temporary noise barrier such as vinyl acoustic <br />curtains or quilted blankets attached to the east property line wall or temporary fence posts. <br />Privacy <br />Privacy concerns regarding windows on the east elevation and visibility from the rooftop amenity <br />deck into backyards or homes were raised. A rendering of eastern views from the rooftop has <br />been provided, views of the single-family dwellings are out of the line of sight from the amenity <br />deck as it is located closer to Main Street. In addition, staff has included a requirement within the <br />Specific Development for clerestory or opaque windows along the building wall that is at the <br />40 foot setback. <br />Staff Recommended Changes) Commented tDH761: We do NOT went the <br />property rexonetl to SD. <br />Since the initial project submittal, the applicant has made changes to the project to address both <br />staff's and the public's comments. Changes made include: <br />- Reduced the number of units from 517 to 476 (Reduction of 41 units -8%)' _ - <br />_- <br />Commented [DH77]: seduce number of <br />2. Removed access on Edgewood Road to reduce the potential for cut -through traffic into <br />units to 20 DUA. <br />the Park Santiago neighborhood. <br />E Reduced the height of the building alongthe east side from 5 -stories (78 feet)to 2 -stories <br />(25 feet)•I _ _ _ - <br />-- <br />Commented [DH78]: Maintain current <br />4. Revised the architectural style. <br />height restrictions of RAO zoning. <br />— -- <br />5. Increased the number of family units from 20 percent of the project to 30 percent. <br />Increased the effective parking ratio from 1,76 to 2.0 per unit through the use of valet. ___-_ <br />commented [DH79]: Apply the SAMc <br />requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.