My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/19/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 9:40:18 AM
Creation date
2/19/2019 2:03:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 7, 2019 <br />Honorable Planning Commission <br />City of Santa Ana <br />PO Box 1988 <br />Santa Ana, CA 92702 <br />RE: 252,15 N. Main Street <br />Dear Chairman and Cornt-nissioners: <br />2019 JAN -8 P;'J - <br />�: t)z 4 <br />CITY 2'-1F SANTh <br />With the upcoming hearing and associated decision which will impact the future of the <br />City of Santa Ana, its citizens and the residents of Park Santiago, I hope that you have <br />had the opportunity to review all the project materials and public comments and have <br />taken to heart the ongoing testimony at the public hearings. <br />As a person who has spent my career in Ian(] development (primarily residential), I have <br />Keen in the developer's shoes and now I am on the other side. I believe I can <br />professionally see both sides unbiasedly and look at the overall possible merits and <br />potential problems of the proposed project. I've always believed development is a <br />balance and I understand that this proposed project is a fine balance between <br />development and fees. <br />I am not opposed to development at this location - development which follows good <br />planning guidelines using honesty in analyzing the project and in the project <br />documentation. <br />In my professional opinion, this is not the case with the proposed project. There are <br />obvious errors and gross negligence in the methodology used in analyzing the project <br />and therefore, the documents produced are flawed and surely challengeable under <br />CEQA. <br />All the proposed density, the project does not fit at this location. <br />In order to protect the City of Santa Ana as good stewards, I urge the planning <br />Commission to do the following� <br />0 Deny the project as currently proposed by the Applicant with 84/DUA (496 units) <br />0 Deny the Staff Report of 81/DUA (476 units) <br />Request the Applicant and Staff to redesign the project to less than 38/DUA <br />(3010U.4waUhd be a o;or 'TeasonaWe" nuinber of DU -A's' -w—h-ich the location <br />can suppof"4), along with a combination of 2 and 3 stories, 3 stories orientated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.