My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 65B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/19/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 65B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 11:45:57 AM
Creation date
2/19/2019 2:34:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
65B
Date
2/5/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 13, 2019 <br />To the Honorable Members of the Santa Ana City Council, <br />On Tuesday, February 5, 2019, the Council narrowly approved a Memo of Understanding (MOU) <br />agreeing to a pay increase for officers in the Santa Ana Police Department amounting to more than $25 <br />million over the course of three years. At that meeting, you were implored by members of the community <br />to reject this MOU given uncertainty over Santa Ana's current financial health; however, the majority of <br />the Council disregarded the public's input and moved forward with approving the MOU. <br />As justification for approving this agreement, members of the Council majority offered explanations that <br />ranged from incomprehensible to downright untruthful. Mayor Pulido was characteristically dismissive of <br />members of the public and his colleagues. Councilmember Sarmiento spoke many words without making <br />a cogent point or offering an explanation for why he felt that such a generous pay increase is warranted at <br />this time or a legitimate use of Measure X revenue. Councilmember Solorio assured residents that these <br />raises will not leverage Measure X tax revenue, despite the fact that the Staff Report accompanying the <br />agenda item specifically identified this revenue as a source of funding. And Councilmember Penaloza <br />was primarily concerned with where Santa Ana Police Department salaries will fall when ranked against <br />other municipalities after the pay increase, indicating he is comfortable with the mark of distinction for our <br />police department being how highly officers are paid rather than how well they serve our community. <br />Given the lack of thoughtful discussion and public debate on this issue, residents of Santa Ana are <br />rightfully displeased with the outcome of your decision to approve this MOU. We are also concerned that <br />this decision was made without the benefit of an accurate understanding of our city's current fiscal <br />situation. The fact that the Council recently dismissed our City Manager, whose responsibility it was to <br />provide an objective and fact -based assessment of our finances to enable the Council to make prudent <br />and sustainable fiscal decisions, further erodes the public's confidence that this MOU was approved <br />based on a comprehensive understanding of its short- and long-term impacts to Santa Ana's finances. <br />Given the concerns that residents have expressed to the Council regarding this MOU, I am writing to <br />encourage you to do the following: <br />Rescind your approval of this MOU, thereby relieving the City of its obligation to pay the <br />increased salary and benefit packages committed to therein. <br />Commission an independent forensic audit of the City's finances in order to ascertain an objective <br />and unbiased assessment of the City's financial foundation. Since funds for such an audit were <br />allocated when Council passed its current budget, initiating such an audit should be possible <br />within short order. <br />Re-enter contract negotiations with employee unions in a truly transparent manner after a <br />comprehensive audit has been completed. This will help the public feel confident that such <br />contracts are entered into with a clear-eyed understanding of our City's finances. <br />As Santa Ana's elected officials, you have an obligation to act in a manner that is aligned with the needs <br />and values of the community you serve. Execution of the MOU to increase officer pay was not consistent <br />with your obligations to our community, but you have an opportunity to make that right. For the sake of <br />Santa Ana's financial health and the well-being of its residents, I hope you will demonstrate humility and <br />move to restore the public's trust by going back to the drawing board on this agreement. <br />Thank you,, <br />Paul Gonzales <br />Santa Ana Resident <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.