Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />SECTION 1: <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />1 <br />The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency purchases 18,000,000 kWh per year to operate well pumps and <br />booster pumps to deliver potable water to 45,000 customer meters. This report evaluates the potential to <br />install on-site renewable energy systems to offset some of this electric load, lowering electric bills and reducing <br />the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. <br />The renewable energy resources evaluated include placing solar PV modules on the roofs of the storage tanks at <br />five pump stations (Cambridge, East, Garthe, South and West), as well as at the City Yard; and recovering head <br />from water that is delivered directly to the city from the Metropolitan Water District at a pressure that is higher <br />than the city uses (SA -1 replacement, SA -3, SA -6). <br />The implementation cost and energy savings have been calculated for these projects and a life cycle cost <br />analysis has been performed for the anticipated 25 -year life of the equipment. The following table shows the <br />anticipated overall cost and benefit projected for the city. 1.1.3 <br />The net effect of all these project is an investment of almost $8 million with 25 years of savings that will exceed <br />the investment by about $2 million. This is not a great financial investment, but it is a good step in <br />implementing the Climate Action Plan with a project that pays for itself. <br />The implementation of these projects would reduce the Water Resources Divisions purchase of electricity by <br />25% compared to 2016. This would also reduce the GHG emissions of 1,330 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent by a <br />similar percentage from 2016. As the SCE fuel mix changes to less GHG from year to year, the GHG savings will <br />Newcomb I Anderson I McCormick 19H-9 CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />Turbine <br />SA -1 <br />($638,763) <br />$38,441 <br />$858,509 <br />$0.090 <br />425,299 <br />Turbine <br />SA -3 <br />($835,988) <br />$31,965 <br />$409,035 <br />$0.060 <br />536,973 <br />Turbine <br />SA -6 <br />($1,072,174) <br />$55,131 <br />$1,075,182 <br />$0.065 <br />845,901 <br />Solar <br />Garthe Station <br />($1,404,000) <br />$38,165 <br />($148,834) <br />$0.043 <br />894,325 <br />Solar <br />South Station <br />($194,832) <br />$3,492 <br />($77,488) <br />$0.046 <br />75,170 <br />Solar <br />West Station <br />($707,940) <br />$39,780 <br />$635,398 <br />$0.094 <br />422,617 <br />Solar <br />East Station <br />($677,160) <br />$19,080 <br />($43,018) <br />$0.048 <br />393,985 <br />Solar <br />Cambridge Station <br />($334,800) <br />$8,332 <br />($67,435) <br />$0.045 <br />184,480 <br />Solar <br />City Yard <br />($1,890,767) <br />$46,325 <br />($298,129) <br />$0.053 <br />869,805 <br />Total <br />Total <br />($7,756,424) <br />$280,711 <br />$2,343,220 <br />$0.060 <br />4,648,554 <br />The net effect of all these project is an investment of almost $8 million with 25 years of savings that will exceed <br />the investment by about $2 million. This is not a great financial investment, but it is a good step in <br />implementing the Climate Action Plan with a project that pays for itself. <br />The implementation of these projects would reduce the Water Resources Divisions purchase of electricity by <br />25% compared to 2016. This would also reduce the GHG emissions of 1,330 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent by a <br />similar percentage from 2016. As the SCE fuel mix changes to less GHG from year to year, the GHG savings will <br />Newcomb I Anderson I McCormick 19H-9 CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />