32A - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP REPORT

Home Browse Search

TTM No. 2018-03, SUP No. 2018-01 January 28, 2018 Page 3 Table 3: Development Standards SAMC Sec. 41-314 to 41-323 Standard Required Provided Height 35 Feet 30 Feet Front Setback 15 Feet 30 Feet Side Setback 5 Feet 57 Feet Rear Setback 10 Feet 46 Feet Off -Street Parking Includes ADA Stalls per Code 585 spaces 589 spaces Proiect Background The site was developed with six office buildings in 1989. The buildings contain one or two stories and are addressed 1920 through 1940 East Deere Avenue. In December 2017, the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) received the subject application. The project was revised to comply with the DRC's requirements. These revisions also included upgrades to driveways aprons, landscaping, and fire -related mitigation measures such as appropriate locations for water hydrants. The site currently meets the landscaping requirements related to buffers and setbacks. However, proposed conditions will require the project to comply with the drought tolerant landscaping requirements set forth in the Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, enacted in 2015. The tentative map is subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator, while the special use permit requires Planning Commission approval, followed by the City Council consent review for both applications. In an effort to expedite the discretionary process, both applications were bundled to start at the at the Planning Commission review. Proiect Analysis Tentative Parcel Map Subdivision requests are governed by Chapter 34 and Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Pursuant to Section 66473.5 and 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act, applications for tentative parcel maps are approved when it can be shown that findings can be made in support of the request. Specifically, findings related to the proposal need to be made that the project is: consistent with the General Plan; the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed project; the proposed project will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat, the proposed project will not cause serious public health problems; and the proposed project will not conflict with easements necessary for public access through or use of the property. Using this information staff has prepared the following analysis, which, in turn forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. In analyzing the 32A-7