Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 13, 2018 <br /> Amenities/ Community Benefits <br /> Neighborhood Concerns & Support <br /> Developer Contributions to Santiago Park <br /> Future Zoning <br /> Planning <br /> Traffic <br /> Benefits of Development <br /> <br /> A question and answer period ensued regarding amenities and parking. <br /> <br />The following public comments were received: <br /> <br /> Genelle Johnson spoke in opposition: traffic and parking <br /> David Pockett spoke in opposition: no zone change; too dense for area. <br /> Billy Leigh spoke in opposition: negative impact on surrounding neighborhood. <br /> Lewis Wood spoke in support: benefit to the City; there will be an economic gain. <br /> Thomas Cartney spoke in opposition: no zone change; too dense for area. <br /> Patricia Coleman spoke in opposition: concerned with parking and building mass; <br />not a good fit. <br /> Brian Potera spoke in opposition: too dense for area; not a good fit. <br /> Sharon Gullikson spoke in opposition: too dense for area; traffic; opposes low- <br />income housing in area. <br /> Christine Denny-Helvig spoke in opposition: too dense for area, traffic; need to <br />consider impact of the other dense projects in the area. <br /> Bill Bonnett spoke in opposition: traffic; conducted a neighborhood survey with 97% <br />opposing project; provided copies of survey. <br /> Dimitri Lujon spoke in opposition: building mass and traffic. <br /> Sue McDonald spoke in opposition: not a good fit. <br /> Stephen Swytak spoke in opposition: not a good fit; traffic. <br /> Esther Lopez spoke in opposition: traffic and safety. <br /> Adriana DeLaRosa spoke in opposition: too dense for area; negative impact on <br />neighborhood. <br /> Elizabeth Hansburg spoke in support: project will not have a negative impact on <br />neighborhood; there is a housing shortage will be beneficial to community. <br /> Dang Le spoke in support: need housing; city will benefit. <br /> Bea Tiritilli spoke in opposition: too dense for area; no zone change; parking issues. <br /> Dale Helvig spoke in opposition: too dense for area; applicant’s statement is <br />inconsistent with Environmental Impact Report; provided copies of letters in <br />opposition. <br /> Diane Fradkin spoke in opposition: not compatible with area; need to redesign and <br />reduce density. <br /> Bill Sornstein spoke in opposition: too dense for area; negative impact on <br />neighborhood; traffic; need to revise building design. <br /> Steve Gorgone spoke in opposition: too dense for area; not compatible with <br />neighborhood; traffic; parking. <br />A-3