My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 85A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
04/16/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 85A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2019 12:57:55 PM
Creation date
4/16/2019 12:45:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
85A
Date
4/16/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lack of affordable housing is a societal problem. As is public <br />transportation, public education or meals and nutritional assistance. <br />Programs to provide this aid are shouldered by all citizens across the <br />tax base. Yet rent control places the burden to provide housing aid on <br />the back of a single business owner, the property owner. We don't <br />require restaurant owners, grocers or bus manufacturers to give away <br />their product or service directly to a low-income consumer; this is an <br />unjust treatment of property owners. <br />Rent control erodes affordable housing. As a governing body <br />considering a rent control housing policy, make no mistake, this will <br />have a chilling effect on investment in Santa Ana. The current state of <br />your rental units will remain the same and slowly begin to deteriorate. <br />Without market incentives to improve properties, deferred <br />maintenance will spread. Even if the owner wants to make <br />improvements and be proactive with maintenance, over time, the lack of <br />capital and cash flow will hinder property owners' ability to maintain <br />high standards. <br />The residents who live in these deteriorating units aren't the only ones <br />that suffer the consequences of rent control. The city is encumbered <br />with blight and decreased property values which lead to lower property <br />tax revenues. Any hopes of securing new units will be lost when <br />investors know the property will be under rent control. It is a lose -lose <br />proposition. <br />Rent control is costly to administer. Our association has dealt with <br />jurisdictions that have enacted rent control and it is extraordinary <br />expensive to administer. In a 2012 study by the San Diego Taxpayer <br />Advocate, Oceanside Rent Control—Costly to Oceanside Taxpayers, An <br />Analysis of the Fiscal Impacts of Rent Control in the City of Oceanside <br />concluded that between 1999-2011 Oceanside Taxpayers have spent <br />and lost $7.5 million as a result of their ordinance and were trending to <br />spend or lose $8 million in the next ten years. <br />Finally, rent control destroys harmony. It is an intangible effect of <br />rent control that is impossible to put a price on, but it is important. Rent <br />control fights can destroy any sense of community and always pits <br />tenant against property owners. It impacts the quality of life tenants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.