|
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana recommends
<br />that the City Council adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2017-
<br />03. This recommendation is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said
<br />hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission
<br />Action dated May 13, 2019 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all
<br />of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
<br />Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information
<br />contained in the initial study and the mitigated negative declaration (MND),
<br />Environmental Review No. 2015-14, prepared with respect to this project. The City
<br />Council has, as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearings
<br />on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental
<br />Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, the MND adequately addresses
<br />the expected environmental impacts of this project. On the basis of this review, the City
<br />Council finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the project
<br />will have a significant adverse effect on the environment.
<br />Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the
<br />public hearing hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2017-03. The
<br />amendments to the Land Use Element are attached hereto as Exhibit A and
<br />incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. This decision is
<br />based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not
<br />limited to: the Request for Council Action dated June 4, 2019, and exhibits attached
<br />hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein
<br />by this reference.
<br />Section 5. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City
<br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies,
<br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims,
<br />demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether
<br />legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative
<br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and
<br />such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"),
<br />brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents,
<br />departments, agencies, and Instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to
<br />modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the
<br />City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and
<br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or
<br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown
<br />Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision
<br />Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or
<br />local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a
<br />court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to
<br />approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing
<br />the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and
<br />expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense.
<br />Resolution No. 2019-xx
<br />Page 3 of 4
<br />75H-30
<br />
|