Laserfiche WebLink
MainPlace Transformation Project <br />City Council Agenda Item 75D <br />June 4, 2019 <br />Page 12 <br />IV. THE ADDENDUM'S CONCLUSIONS ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY <br />SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. <br />A. There is no Evidence that the Project Will Not Result in a New Significant <br />Construction -Related Air Quality Impact. <br />The Addendum concludes that the Project will not have a significant new air quality <br />impact caused by Project construction. This conclusion is not supported by substantial evidence <br />because the Addendum never evaluates the Proj ect's construction -related criteria air pollutant <br />emissions. SWAPE Comments, p. 3. <br />The Addendum's Air Quality Analysis states: <br />The implementation of the improved off -road equipment emissions standards that have <br />occurred since the time of the Final EIR would result in Project construction emissions <br />that are substantially lower than what was anticipated in the Final EIR. The MainPlace <br />Specific Plan also identified sustainability features to enhance sustainability of the <br />Project. These sustainability features include the compliance with all SCAQMD <br />standards for construction equipment and the use of Tier 4 equipment where available <br />during grading. Additionally, construction of the Proposed Project would be required to <br />comply with various SCAQMD rules, including Rule 402 (Nuisance) and Rule 403 <br />(Fugitive Dust). SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 identify measures to be implemented for <br />the control fugitive dust generated during ground -disturbance activities. As such, <br />construction emissions would be lower than what was anticipated for the Approved <br />Project. No new construction impacts would occur. <br />Addendum, Appendix F, p. 29. <br />The Addendum concludes that the Project's construction -related air emissions would be <br />lower than those anticipated in the 1983 EIR, and therefore the Project would not result in new or <br />more significant impacts. But there is no evidence to support this conclusion. Neither the <br />Addendum nor the 1983 EIR quantified or evaluated the level of criteria air pollutants generated <br />by project construction. Without determining what the actual emissions would be, there is no <br />evidence on which the Addendum can base its conclusion on that the Project will result in lower <br />emissions than the 1983 Project. <br />The South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") is the air pollution <br />control agency for the region in which the Project is located. SWAPE, p. 3. SCAQMD provides <br />quantitative maximum daily significance thresholds significance for emissions of several criteria <br />air pollutants during construction and operational activities. SWAPE, pp. 3-4. <br />