My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - CS-1
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
06/04/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - CS-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2019 3:25:34 PM
Creation date
6/4/2019 3:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
CS-1
Date
6/4/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orono, Norma <br />From: Tim Johnson < <br />Sent: Monday, June 03, 2019 4:56 PM <br />To: Pulido, Miguel; Sarmiento, Vicente; Solorio, Jose; eComment; Villegas, Juan; Iglesias, <br />Cecilia; Penaloza, David; rreyna@santa-ana.org; Funk, John <br />Subject: Closed Session Item 1 <br />This correspondence is with regards to Closed Session item 1 as it relates to our on going cases with homeless <br />issues. As part of those cases, I felt that Judge Carter was impressed with the potential progress of the Yale facility at <br />his last hearings in April. As you know, Judge Carter also has expressed that he feels that Santa Ana has carried more <br />than its fair share in the past but still needs to take care of its homeless. However, since his last hearing things seem to <br />have changed with regards to Yale which may change the tenor of his hearings towards Santa Ana (and possibly the <br />county obviously too). <br />As you know, the city approved of an MOU on Sept 6, 2018 agreeing to work in conjunction with the county on a <br />emergency shelter to replace The Courtyard and The Armory. The location in the MOU proved to not be feasible and <br />the county ended up purchasing the Yale site after conferring with the City in 4Q 2018 a few times. Subsequently, <br />Supervisor Do informed the City that the county was stopping progress on the Yale facility until such a time that the City <br />reaffirms its commitment to the Yale site. <br />I believe that the county has not done an adequate job of presenting to the City and its residents (and others in the <br />county) how the proposed Yale facility will operate. I also understand that from discussions with the county that they <br />will not be putting out an operational plan until the City reaffirms. However, I believe that the county should be putting <br />out an outline of how the Yale site would be operated. Through some various discussions with the county, they have <br />communicated to me that the site will be operated in a manner similar to Bridges at Kraemer or The Link. Both of which <br />when you drive by them, most people would have no idea it is a homeless shelter facility. However, we need something <br />in writing on this in my opinion whether it be a revised MOU or even some written press statements. <br />Essentially, the County is waiting for the City to reaffirm its commitment while the City (your group) may be waiting to <br />reaffirm until after it knows what the proposed site would operate as. I would urge your group to put out conditions <br />under which the Yale facility may be acceptable to the City which I imagine may include items such as: <br />• Referral Only- Referral only type of facility... no walk in or out for residents. <br />• Anti -Loitering Zone- Establishment of a 1 mile anti -loitering zone which would be enforced by OCSD. I <br />believe that the county may be willing to contribute funds for SAPID to enforce this zone however until such a <br />time that the SAPID is staffed up, you may want to encourage alternative enforcement by OCSD. <br />• Transportation Plan- Establishment of transportation plans to cities outside of Santa Ana. This would <br />include cities both inside the Central SPA and also other cities. Although the proposed facility may be ultimately <br />for Santa Ana and the Central SPA, there initially will be residents from all over the county due to movement <br />from The Courtyard so transportation to other cities even outside of the Central SPA seems to be appropriate. <br />• Sharing the Load- The county should be well on its way to establishing emergency housing facilities in South <br />County and be able to communicate this. We should see some movement by the county in this direction. If <br />someone were to call 211 or OC Healthcare asking for shelter, they will be referred to Santa Ana. This is does <br />not seem appropriate and as such, other cities in South SPA also need to have emergency facilities. The county <br />currently owns properly zoned property in South County but it appears to be choosing not to utilize it. <br />• Jail Release- I understand that OCSD is no longer releasing inmates in the middle of the night which I believe <br />to be beneficial but they are still being released from the county jail in Santa Ana directly onto our streets <br />regardless as to where they were originally arrested or their city of origin. I believe this to be true even if they <br />were inmates at the county jail facility in Irvine (Musick) I would suggest that you use this opportunity to also <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.