Laserfiche WebLink
Mesa and Irvine. <br />The City Council has weighed and balanced the General Plan's policies, <br />both new and old, and has determined that based upon this balancing that <br />General Plan Amendment No. 2019-01 is consistent with the purpose of <br />the General Plan. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not <br />adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the General <br />Plan Amendment will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent <br />properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or <br />adverse impacts to the environment. <br />Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the <br />public hearing hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2019-01. The <br />amendments to the Land Use Element are attached hereto as Exhibit A and <br />incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein, subject to the <br />Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and upon satisfaction of the <br />conditions set forth in Section 5 below. This decision is based upon the evidence <br />submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request <br />for Council Action dated June 4, 2019, and exhibits attached hereto; and the public <br />testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. <br />Section 5. This Resolution shall not be effective unless and until Ordinance No. <br />NS-2968 (AA No. 2019-01) to rezone the property from Single -Family Residential (R-1) to <br />Specific Development (SD) No. 94 becomes effective. If said ordinance is for any reason <br />held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, <br />or otherwise do not go into effect for any reason, then this resolution shall be null and void <br />and have no further force and effect. <br />Section 6. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, <br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all <br />claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether <br />legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative <br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, <br />and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), <br />brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, <br />departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek <br />to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by <br />the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of <br />the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the <br />Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning <br />Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or <br />any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, <br />regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed <br />that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably <br />withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall <br />reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by <br />Resolution No. 2019-048 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />