My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-047 - Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Review No. 2018-75
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-047 - Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Review No. 2018-75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 12:18:40 PM
Creation date
6/20/2019 8:32:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-047
Date
6/4/2019
Destruction Year
P
Document Relationships
NS-2968
(Amended By)
Path:
\Ordinances\2011 - 2020 (NS-2813 - NS-3000)\2019 (NS-2963 - NS-2978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures <br />Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier <br />document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. <br />6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for <br />potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or <br />outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the <br />statement is substantiated. <br />7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or <br />individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. <br />8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead <br />agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's <br />environmental effects in whatever format is selected. <br />9) The explanation of each issue should identify: <br />a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and <br />b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. <br />N. ISSUES: <br />Potentially <br />Potentially Significant Less Than <br />Significant Unless Significant No Impact <br />Impact Mitigation Impact <br />Incorporated <br />I. AESTHETICS: Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic <br />vista? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />b) <br />Substantially damage scenic resources, including <br />but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and <br />historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />c) <br />In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the <br />existing visual character or quality of public views <br />of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are <br />those that are experienced from publicly accessible <br />vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized <br />area, would the project conflict with applicable <br />zoning and other regulations governing scenic <br />quality? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />d) <br />Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />that will adversely affect day or nighttime views in <br />the area? <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 14 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration — March 14, 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.