My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-047 - Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Review No. 2018-75
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-047 - Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Review No. 2018-75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 12:18:40 PM
Creation date
6/20/2019 8:32:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-047
Date
6/4/2019
Destruction Year
P
Document Relationships
NS-2968
(Amended By)
Path:
\Ordinances\2011 - 2020 (NS-2813 - NS-3000)\2019 (NS-2963 - NS-2978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
XXI. <br />MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: <br />a) <br />Does the project have the potential to substantially <br />degrade the quality of the environment, <br />substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife <br />species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop <br />below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a <br />plant or animal community, substantially reduce the <br />number or restrict the range of a rare or <br />endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important <br />examples of the major periods of California history <br />or prehistory? <br />❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />b) <br />Does the project have impacts that are individually <br />limited, but cumulatively considerable? <br />("Cumulatively considerable" means that the <br />incremental effects of a project are considerable <br />when viewed in connection with the effects of past <br />projects, the effects of other current projects, and <br />the effects of probable future projects.) <br />❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br />c) <br />Does the project have environmental effects that <br />will cause substantial adverse effects on human <br />beings, either directly or indirectly? <br />❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br />O. Explanation of Issues <br />I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. There are no State or County <br />designated scenic vistas either adjacent to or within direct view of the site and would be impacted by <br />the project. Furthermore, there are no city designed scenic resources, including scenic corridors, <br />secondary corridors, city entries, inter -city corridors or scenic views identified in the Scenic Corridors <br />Element of the Santa Ana General Plan that are adjacent to the site. MacArthur Boulevard, which is a <br />Primary Street Corridor and located approximately one-half mile north of the project, is the closest city <br />designated street corridor to the site and is not visible from the site. The project would not have any <br />scenic vista impacts. <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, <br />and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. There are no state designated <br />scenic highways and no scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within <br />a state scenic highway either adjacent to or visible from the site that would be removed or altered by <br />the project. The closest state designated scenic route to the project is the section of the 91 Freeway <br />from the 55 Freeway on the west to the east Anaheim area, which is approximately eleven miles <br />northeast of the project. The project is not visible from this section of the 91 Freeway that is a state <br />designated scenic highway. The project would not impact a state scenic resource. <br />c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public <br />views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from <br />publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project <br />conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than <br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 22 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration — March 14, 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.