Laserfiche WebLink
TTT <br />1.1.3 Existing General Plan and Zoning <br />Seneral Plan <br />The property is identified in the General Plan Land Use Element as <br />District Center (DC). The District Center designation includes the <br />major activity areas of the City, designed to serve as anchors to the <br />City's commercial corridors and to accommodate major development <br />activity. The site is also identified as being within the Downtown <br />Redevelopment area (no longer active after the elimination of the <br />Department of Finance's Redevelopment Agency in California.) <br />The MainPlace District Center is a mixed -use designation identified in <br />the General Plan as including a "regional shopping center and office <br />complex, as well as high -intensity housing and mixed -use <br />development" (Land Use Element, page A-22). Table A-2 of the <br />General Plan identifies MainPlace as allowing a Floor Area Ratio of <br />2.1. The General Plan allows the FAR to be calculated on an area -wide <br />basis rather than on a per -lot basis. District Centers are allowed up to <br />90 dwelling units per acre for residential uses. The General Plan's <br />District Center designation would allow up to 4,486,074 square feet <br />of mixed uses, inclusive of residential uses, based on the maximum <br />FAR of 2.1 over the 49-acre site. As proposed, the MainPlace <br />Transformation Project will result in a District -wide FAR of 2.08 and a <br />density of 39 dwelling units per acre, within the maximums allowed <br />in the General Plan. No General Plan Amendment is required or <br />proposed. <br />Zoning <br />The existing zoning for MainPlace is General Commercial (C-2), which <br />includes a range of commercial uses as well as all of the uses allowed <br />in the Community Commercial (C-1) zone. The MainPlace Specific <br />Plan, upon adoption by the City Council, would become the zoning <br />for the property and would define the allowable uses within its <br />boundaries. <br />INTRODUCTION 1 1 <br />1.1.4 Relationship to CEQA and Past CEQA Documentation <br />The City of Santa Ana is the lead agency for purposes of <br />environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA). MainPlace has been the subject of prior environmental <br />review. <br />The Fashion Square Commercial Center Subsequent Final <br />Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) was certified by the City of <br />Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency in 1983. The Final EIR was <br />prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with buildout <br />of the project site with up to 3.1 million square feet (sf) of office and <br />retail uses and 1,200 hotel rooms. The project site was within a <br />Redevelopment Plan Area as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan of <br />the Santa Ana Redevelopment Project, as amended (June 1975) as <br />addressed in the Redevelopment Plan Final EIR (May 15, 1975). <br />As addressed in the Final EIR, the project assumed the rehabilitation <br />and redevelopment of the site as a mixed -use commercial complex <br />consistent with the City's Redevelopment Plan. Project <br />implementation required demolition of Main Street Center Fashion <br />Square and partial demolition of Fashion Square Center. The Final EIR <br />assumed that 400,000 sf of the Fashion Square Center would be <br />retained allowing for the ultimate buildout of the site with 1.5 million <br />sf (net leasable) of office uses; 1.6 million sf (gross leasable) of retail <br />uses; and 1,200 hotel rooms. <br />In 1996, the City prepared an Addendum to the Final EIR to evaluate <br />a then -proposed expansion of the shopping center's retail uses. The <br />1996 Addendum evaluated the topical issues addressed in the Final <br />EIR, including the preparation of updated air quality and traffic <br />analyses. The Addendum concluded that reliance on the prior Final <br />EIR was appropriate because the impacts identified (in the Final EIR) <br />"were much greater than the impacts associated with the existing <br />facility plus the proposed expansion." While the 1996 project was not <br />MAINPLACE SPECIFIC PLAN 1 1-7 <br />