My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - RPT - HOO UPDATE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
07/02/2019
>
65B - RPT - HOO UPDATE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2019 6:54:26 PM
Creation date
6/27/2019 6:53:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
65B
Date
7/2/2019
Destruction Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 1 <br />Table 2: Summary of San Francisco's Affordability Requirements4l <br />Small For-SAo Units Small Rental Units Large For•Saie Units Large Rental Units <br />Onsite <br />.12.5%;f0rlowincwmc3 <br />12.5%° for low fneeme3 <br />21'%° ... <br />199V ;? <br />,foflow;•'.' <br />5°/°.formodgtnte <br />40 fdr'inodeSete..•: '. <br />3% lormidd q i , c ; ` <br />:.' 'i% foYwlidle` <br />Off -site <br />20%forlowincome <br />20%for low income <br />33% <br />30% <br />18%for low <br />18%for low <br />8%for moderate <br />6%for moderate <br />7% for middle <br />6% for middle <br />r Affordable For -sale units for low-income households earn up to 80% of MA moderate -income households earn up <br />to 105% of AK and middle -income households cam up to 130% of AMI. <br />7 Affordable rental units for low-income households earn up to 55% of AM; moderate -income households earn up to <br />80% of AK and middle -income households cam up to 110% of AM. <br />315 % at full implementation <br />126% at full implementation <br />324% at full implementation <br />Impact: It is too early to identify the impacts of the city's new Inclusionary Housing Program. <br />However, the most recent housing inventory report indicates that in 2017, 421 inclusionary units <br />were added which accounts for 28.8% of all affordable units provided through all city programs.9 <br />City of Sacramento <br />Mixed Income Housing Ordinance <br />Backeround: In 2015, the Sacramento City Council modified its Mixed Income housing <br />Ordinance to a fee -based policy in compliance with the Palmer decision. Prior to 2015, Sacramento <br />had a project -percentage requirement of 5% of total dwelling units to be affordable to low-income <br />households earning up to 80% of AMI and 10% for very low-income households with income up <br />to 50% of AMC These units were required to be built on the site of the development project, to the <br />extent possible. The City cites one of the reasons for moving away from the project-porcentage <br />approach was the difficulty of marketing for -sale inclusionary units due to a limited range of <br />qualified buyers.10 <br />Base Reuirement: The Ordinance requires that an affordable housing impact fee be assessed for <br />all now market rate housing units, with the intent of providing housing for a variety of incomes <br />and family types. Residential developments larger than 100 acres are additionally required to <br />develop a Council -approved mixed -income housing strategy. The strategy demonstrates how the <br />projeotprovides housing forvariety of incomes and family types. It may also provide for fee credits <br />for land dedication, construction of affordable units, or another mechanism that leads to affordable <br />housing. <br />9 2017 San Francisco Housing Inventory, San Francisco <br />Council Report, <br />Report ID: 2015-00668, <br />65B-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.