Laserfiche WebLink
Lopez, Kenia <br />From: Cruz, Yesenia <br />Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2019 5:17 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: FW: City Council meeting July 2, 2019Item 75A <br />Attachments: 11x17 Survey Site Plan with Property Lines.pdf, Historic Downtown Santa Ana <br />Parking.pdf <br />Please see attached correspondence. Thanks <br />From: Mitra Farokhpay [ <br />Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2019 5:44 AM <br />To: Penaloza, David <DPenaloza@santa-ana.org> <br />Cc: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-ana.org> <br />Subject: City Council meeting July 2, 2019 Item 75A <br />Dear Councilman Penaloza and other distinguished Council members, <br />I am one of the owners of the Historic Pacific Symphony building in UC zone, which is one of <br />the properties in item 75A that will be discussed tonight. A quick explanation and the attached <br />pictures of our case may shed some light on the importance of passage of this item for Santa <br />Ana and it's residents. <br />My partner and I are both registered architects and hold Masters degree in City and Regional <br />Planning. For years we have been wanting to purchase a property in Santa Ana to develop. In <br />2015 we purchased the Pacific Symphony building, which had been left vacant for almost a <br />decade before our purchase. Since then, we have had some success in stopping the break- ins, but <br />the dilemma continues and it will not stop until this property is developed. <br />Since 2016, with the help of multiple local realtors and particularly the Economic Development <br />department, the property was shown to many interested parties including but not limited to the school <br />district, the developers of Lab in Costa Mesa, multiple banquet facility owners, an interactive theater <br />company, churches, high tech companies, etc... Majority of the visitors liked the building and thought <br />it had great potential for their business. However, after reviewing the City requirements such as on <br />site parking, which is impossible to achieve in our case, they did not pursue our building since they <br />did not know if the City will ever allow development without parking and satisfying some other <br />unattainable requirements, so they decided to look to other cities. <br />As you can see in the attached drawing, this building occupies the entire property and there is no <br />room to provide even one parking space. It was first built as a church, then the Pacific <br />Symphony and then Museum of Natural History occupied it without having on site parking. <br />Many cities consider this situation "non confirming legal building", and provide exemption from <br />onsite parking and other unattainable requirements. Please bear in mind that besides being a <br />historic building in Santa Ana, it is also on the National Registry and exterior of the building <br />can't be altered. <br />5 <br />