My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FPPC CHANGES REAL PROPERTY MATERIALITY RULES
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Legal Opinions
>
Memos
>
FPPC CHANGES REAL PROPERTY MATERIALITY RULES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2019 1:36:50 PM
Creation date
7/19/2019 9:52:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/29/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1190 W <br />BEST BEST & KRIEGER 3 <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />Memorandum <br />To: <br />PUBLIC AGENCY CLIENTS <br />From: <br />BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP <br />Date: <br />MAY 29, 2014 <br />Re: <br />FPPC CHANGES REAL PROPERTY MATERIALITY RULES <br />Last month, the Fair Political Practices Commission ("FPPC") repealed <br />Regulation 18704.2 and amended Regulation 18705.2 thereby adopting new rules for <br />evaluating whether a public official's financial interest in real property' rises to a <br />disqualifying conflict of interestZ Effective May 31, 2014, public officials can no longer <br />rely on the old 500 foot property rule and the related "one -penny" rule when determining <br />whether a property interest owned by a public official results in a disqualifying conflict of <br />interest. <br />What was the old rule? <br />Previously, public officials determined whether they had a disqualifying real <br />property interest by conducting a two part analysis. <br />First, was the property interest in question either "directly" or "indirectly" <br />involved in a pending decision before the agency? <br />• Second, did the property interest reach a certain materiality threshold? <br />'rhe Political Reform Act ("Act") does not prevent officials from owning or acquiring financial interests that may <br />conflict with their official duties, nor does the mere possession of such interests require officials to resign from <br />office. An official has an "interest in real property" when the official, or his or her spouse or dependent children, <br />has a direct or indirect equity, option, or leasehold interest of $2,000 or more in a parcel of property (e.g., <br />ownership, mortgages, deeds of trusts, options to buy, or joint tenancies) located in, or within two miles of, the <br />geographical jurisdiction of the official's agency (e.g., within two miles of city boundaries for city officials), (Gov. <br />Code §§ 82033, 82035.) <br />z In 2013, the FPPC began a process of reviewing and overhauling several of its regulations, including the eight -step <br />conflict of interest analysis. Last year, the FPPC presented a new organizational structure which simplifies and <br />consolidates this analysis into a new four -step process. For a number of years, this eight -step analysis had been the <br />method for determining whether an official could make, participate in making, or influence a governmental decision <br />that involved his or her real property interest. <br />This product provided under the Public Policy & Ethics Group Program <br />09879.00000\8808268.2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.