Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 13, 2018 <br /> Courtney Conlogue spoke in opposition: too dense for area; negative impact on <br />neighborhood. <br /> Giles Candy spoke in opposition: too dense for area; need a more appropriate <br />developer. <br /> Michael Plantamura spoke in opposition: too dense for area; no zone change. <br /> Cathy Morehead spoke in opposition: entire project needs to be reconsidered; <br />traffic. <br /> Juan Hernandez spoke in opposition: negative impact on neighborhood; traffic. <br /> Chris Schmidt spoke in opposition: too dense for area; not enough City resources <br />to service project; grant funding to nearby park could be jeopardized. <br /> Peggy Sleggell spoke in opposition: lack of parking; not compatible with <br />neighborhood. <br /> Sabrina Robinson spoke in opposition: lack of parking; there is not a housing crisis. <br /> Michelle O’Valle spoke in opposition: will destroy Park Santiago. <br /> Rob Richardson spoke in opposition: building mass is too large; decision should be <br />made in the best interest of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />***END OF WORK STUDY CALENDAR*** <br /> <br />*Recess at 7:59 p.m. Commission reconvened at 8:04 p.m. <br /> <br />BUSINESS CALENDAR ITEMS <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2018-01 FOR THE PROPOSED <br />PROJECT (MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK) LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET <br /> <br />Legal noticed published in the Orange County Register on August 17, 2018 and notices <br />mailed on August 17, 2018. <br /> <br />The following disclosures were made: <br /> <br /> Commissioner Alderete disclosed that he discussed the project with the applicants. <br /> Commissioner Verino discussed the project with the applicants. <br /> Commissioner Nguyen discussed the project with the applicants. <br /> Chair McLoughlin was contacted by the applicant to discuss the project. <br /> <br />Case Planner Kelaher provided a project overview which included information on the <br />CEQA Process, Environmental Impact Report, DEIR Analysis, Alternatives, Summary of <br />Mitigation and Impacts, and Next Steps. <br /> <br />The following written communication was received and distributed to the Commission prior <br />to the meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />A-4