My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 2:22:53 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 2:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rebuttal to Developers View on Sunshine Meeting Sunshine Meeting Report ‐ Neighborhood Rebuttal‐Table View Page 9 of 14 2018‐11‐13 Traffic and Parking: COMMENT QUESTION REPORTED TO DEVELOPER DEVELOPER RESPONSE: NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE: 7. There is a huge problem with cars running through Park Santiago now. We will work with our traffic engineers, architects and City staff to make the egress away from Park Santiago community and towards Main Street. The only difference we see is it will increase the volume of cut‐through traffic. 8. You think there will be a benefit of reduced traffic with apartments instead of commercial? Office would create significantly more traffic than the existing use, for instance a 5‐story buildings would generate approximately 10,000 daily trips compared to the approximately 2,812 daily trips for the proposed residential use (if the existing building were fully occupied it would create approximately 2,938 daily trips). Same response as LAND USE #2: The reference to a 5‐story office complex is not relevant. The property is zoned P (PROFESSIONAL), which limits the building to 3‐stories. The applicant makes the point that Santa Ana is one of the most overcrowded/dense cities in terms of people to housing ratios. This is our point as well, Santa Ana does not need more housing, it needs more jobs and places for high quality jobs. 9. What is a trip? The movement of one car in or out. No comment 10. How many trips anticipated for project? You have to assume 90% of people will leave in the morning and come home at same time in evening. Based on the traffic engineer’s study, the proposed project would generate 2,812 trips per day, whereas the existing building if fully used would generate 2,938 trips per day. I don’t believe it. 11. How many parking stalls are currently on site? There are 441 stalls on site. Count again. 12. The number of parking spaces on site don’t correlate to traffic. Business uses highlight cars coming in and out all day, in addition, they have visitors and services that create trips throughout the day. Employees also contribute to the trip count with multiple daily trips. It is also only on given days, not 24/7. 13. Look at current traffic now. Please keep in mind that the proposed project will result in less daily trips than the current structure would if fully leased and operational. We respectfully disagree. 14. People park on our streets on Spurgeon now, it will get worse. We are providing ample parking, it will exceed the parking needs of the project. In fact, we would be open to discussion of providing guest parking for the Park Santiago community. Guest parking, handicap parking should be considered for any multi‐family living project. We can’t believe the applicant would mention guest parking for the community when they talk about 1.52 spots per unit (1.52 is a made‐up number) for the Park Santiago community.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.