My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 2:22:53 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 2:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br /> Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late model engines, low‐ <br />emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after‐treatment <br />products, and/or other options as they become available. <br /> The District’s Construction Mitigation Calculator can be used to identify an equipment <br />fleet that achieves this reduction. <br />3. The project representative shall ensure that emissions from all off‐road diesel‐powered <br />equipment used on the project site do not exceed 40% opacity for more than three minutes in <br />any one hour. <br /> Any equipment found to exceed 40 percent opacity (or Ringelmann 2.0) shall be <br />repaired immediately. Non‐compliant equipment will be documented and a summary <br />provided to the lead agency monthly. <br /> A visual survey of all in‐operation equipment shall be made at least weekly. <br /> A monthly summary of the visual survey results shall be submitted throughout the <br />duration of the project, except that the monthly summary shall not be required for any <br />30‐day period in which no construction activity occurs. The monthly summary shall <br />include the quantity and type of vehicles surveyed as well as the dates of each survey. <br />4. The District and/or other officials may conduct periodic site inspections to determine <br />compliance. Nothing in this mitigation shall supersede other District, state or federal rules or <br />regulations. <br />These measures offer a cost‐effective, feasible way to incorporate lower‐emitting design features into <br />the proposed Project, which subsequently reduces emissions released during Project construction. An <br />updated EIR must be prepared to include DPM‐related mitigation measures, as well as include an <br />updated air quality analysis to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to <br />reduce construction emissions and reduce health risk impacts to a less than significant level. <br />Furthermore, the Project Applicant needs to demonstrate commitment to the implementation of these <br />measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s emissions are reduced to the maximum <br />extent possible. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. <br /> <br />Hadley Nolan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.