My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-19_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
01-14-19
>
01-14-19_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:02:30 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 3:57:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
492
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />Resolution No. _____ Page 36 of 71 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br /> <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance <br />Rate Maps (FIRM) for the Project site and vicinity (FEMA FIRM number 06059C0163) shows that the <br />site is shown adjacent to, but not part of, a 100-year flood zone associated with Santiago Creek (Zone <br />AE21). The Project site is identified on the FEMA map as “Zone X” and is not depicted within a 100- or <br />500- year flood zone. <br /> <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />43.) <br /> <br />9.9.8 Structures That Impede or Redirect Flows <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would <br />impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed above, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood <br />hazard area, and it will not place any structure within a 100-year flood hazard area. <br /> <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />43.) <br /> <br />9.9.9 Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death as a Result of Flooding <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or <br />death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? <br /> <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to a <br />significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a dam. As shown in <br />the General Plan Public Safety Element, Exhibit 4, the Project site is not located within the dam inundation <br />area. Moreover, the site is located 130-feet up-gradient from Santiago Creek, which is generally dry, <br />unless conveying storm flows. <br /> <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />43.) <br /> <br />9.9.10 Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project have significant effects relating to inundation by seiche, tsunami, <br />or mudflow? <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) <br />2-72
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.