Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />Resolution No. _____ Page 12 of 71 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br /> <br />However, even with implementation of the PDF-1 and Mitigation Measure AES-1, the Project would still <br />result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant <br />pursuant to the City’s criteria. As a result, impacts related to existing visual character or quality of the site <br />would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) <br /> <br />8.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL <br />OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. <br /> <br />The City hereby finds that feasible Mitigation Measures have been identified in the DEIR and this <br />Resolution that will avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental <br />impacts to a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> Compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, PDFs, and the identification of feasible mitigation <br />measures have reduced potential impacts to a level of less than significant as determined by the City. All <br />of the PDFs and mitigation measures will be included in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program <br />(MMRP) in order to ensure compliance with all conditions adopted by the City. Where potentially <br />significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to PDFs or existing <br />regulations that reduce environmental impacts, the EIR and these Findings specify how those impacts <br />were reduced to an acceptable level. <br /> <br />The potentially significant impacts, and the Mitigation Measures that will reduce them to a less than <br />significant level, are as follows: <br /> <br />8.1 Air Quality <br /> <br />8.1.1 Exposure of Substantial Pollutant Concentrations to Sensitive Receptors <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? <br /> <br />Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-17 through 4.2-18.) <br />Facts in Support of Findings: As detailed in the DEIR, the Project has the potential to exceed the <br />SCAQMD’s localized significance thresholds for emissions of PM 10 during construction activities. <br />Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure <br />AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off-road diesel construction equipment that complies <br />with EPA/CARB Tier 3 emissions standards, would be implemented to reduce construction emissions <br />below a level of significance. With implementation of SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 and <br />Mitigation Measure AQ-1 that would be confirmed through the City’s permitting process for the Project, <br />localized construction emissions of PM 10 would be below SCAQMD thresholds and reduced to a less than <br />significant level. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the construction <br />contractor shall use off-road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/CARB Tier 3 <br />emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment be tuned and maintained in <br />accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. <br />With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-AQ-1), the Project’s impact in <br />Air Quality would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-17 through 4.2-18.) <br /> <br />2-48