Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 61 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 14, 2019 <br /> <br />The project proposes approximately 0.92 acres (40,075 square feet) of pervious area throughout the <br />site to allow surface water to percolate into the local soil. The project would result in an 8% (12,632 <br />square feet) reduction of pervious area on the site for water percolation and absorption compared to the <br />existing condition. The City has stated it has an adequate water supply to meet the water needs of the <br />project and the reduction in pervious open space for local water percolation would not significantly <br />deplete and impact groundwater supplies. The project would have a less than significant impact on <br />groundwater supplies. <br /> <br />c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a <br />manner, which would: <br /> <br />i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. As <br />discussed in section “X.a)” above, silt could be generated from the site during site demolition, <br />grading and construction of the project, especially if construction occurs during the winter months <br />when rainfall typically occurs. The City would require the project developer to prepare a Storm <br />Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with California State Water Resources <br />Control Board (State Water Board), Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ, National <br />Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. CAS618030 (Permit). The <br />SWPPP would require the contractor to implement Best Available Technology Economically <br />Achievable measures to reduce and eliminate storm water pollution from all construction activity <br />through the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). Implementation of the required <br />SWPPP prior to and throughout project construction would reduce and minimize potential siltation <br />impacts. <br /> <br />As also discussed in section “X.a)” above, the project developer would be required by the City to <br />have a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) approved prior to the start of grading. The <br />WQMP would identify the BMPs that would be used on-site to control anticipated pollutants during <br />the life of the project from entering the storm water runoff from the site. The types of pollutants that <br />are anticipated to be generated during the life of the project include suspended solids, sediment, <br />nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens, pesticides, toxic organic compounds, oil and grease and trash <br />and debris. The State required WQMP identifies the measures that would be included in the project <br />including the use of a retention/detention basin, storm water clarifier, and catch basins with BMPs. <br /> <br />The implementation by the developer of the required SWPPP and WQMP would reduce potential <br />erosion or siltation impacts to less than significant. <br /> <br />ii Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in <br />flooding on-or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in section “IX.c)” above, the <br />project would not alter the existing drainage patterns on the site. The existing drainage patterns on <br />the site would be maintained and project flows would continue to be south to Sunflower Avenue. <br />Maintaining the existing on-site drainage pattern along with the proposed biofiltration systems would <br />prevent flooding impacts on or off the site. <br /> <br />iii Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? <br />Less Than Significant Impact. Based on hydrologic calculations in the hydrology report, project <br />generated storm water runoff from the site would increase for the 2-year, 25-year and 100-year <br />storm events. Table 10 shows the increase in surface water runoff from the project compared to <br />the existing condition. As shown, the project would increase the amount of surface water generated <br />6-83