Laserfiche WebLink
I would like to offer a suggestion -- in regards to the building design; more specifically, the <br />proposed window design. <br /> <br />*By the way, I have some background in architecture, urban development, and graphic design <br />-- therefore I am happy to share some of my ideas with you! <br /> <br /> <br />Many new buildings across the city seem to have odd-looking windows – with a strange <br />design; unfortunately, the 651 West Sunflower Ave. development is one of them (according to <br />the latest images from Urbanize LA). The mullion appears to be: the fixed glass panel is <br />located below the operable window: However, this so-called "Contemporary design" <br />is architecturally & aesthetically incorrect, to be honest; it looks like a simply "inverted" <br />version of a traditional mullion. Unfortunately, this design looks extremely awkward and <br />primitive, ruining the entire aesthetics of a new building. It is indeed strange that so many <br />developers are so obsessed with this primitive window mullion! <br /> <br />Another major drawback of this type of windows -- is that the upper vertical "divider" <br />(separating the operable windows) obstructs a clear skyline view from the window, as <br />eloquently mentioned by one of the developers. As a comparison, the traditional pattern's <br />upper fixed horizontal glass panel provides a clear, unobstructed skyline view. <br /> <br />Therefore, instead of "contemporary" odd-looking windows, the developers should install this <br /> traditional type of mullion design - the type that is a standard all across the world, <br />including many of our own U.S. cities. The Design Studio should truly change its standard, and <br />consider to implement this traditional type on new developments. <br /> <br />Attached please find a drawing – current design (as described above) versus suggested. <br /> <br />I'm also attaching a revised image of the 651 West Sunflower Ave. development (I took the <br />liberty of photoshopping the windows) -- and applying the improved look of the windows to <br />your original renderings. You can see how much better the building now appears -- once you <br />apply these traditional types of windows. -- again, see the "Revised1.jpg" and <br />"Revised2.jpg" attachments. <br /> <br />Therefore, I strongly recommend that the City encourages the developer to Not include this <br />“inverted” contemporary design: . Instead, if a developer prefers a simpler type of <br />window, then this traditional type of mullion should be the standard. <br /> <br /> <br />Otherwise, I am in full SUPPORT of this great project. I specifically love the color design and