Laserfiche WebLink
55394.00053\32005824.1 <br />Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not <br />limited to the 1983 EIR, the 1996 Addendum, and the 2019 Addendum, the <br />Planning Commission finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for <br />disclosing the changes to the MainPlace Mall Property, and that none of the <br />conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA <br />Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have <br />occurred, because: <br /> <br />A. The MainPlace Project does not constitute a substantial change <br />that would require major revisions of the 1983 EIR due to the <br />involvement of new significant environmental effects or a <br />substantial increase in the severity of previously identified <br />significant effects. <br /> <br />B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the MainPlace Project will be developed that would <br />require major revisions of the 1983 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br />the severity of the previously identified significant effects. <br /> <br />C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented <br />that was not known and could not have been known with the <br />exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 1983 EIR was <br />certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the <br />modifications would have one or more significant effects not <br />discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that <br />significant effects previously examined would be substantially more <br />severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) <br />that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be <br />feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce <br />one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt <br />such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would <br />substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the <br />environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. <br /> <br />SECTION 2. FINDINGS. Based on the entire record before the City Council, <br />including all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council <br />hereby determines that following findings, which must be established in order to grant <br />Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-01, have been established as required by Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code: <br />A. The proposed project, as conditioned, and its design and improvements <br />are consistent with the District Center designation of the General Plan and <br />are otherwise consistent with all other Elements of the General Plan.