My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
05-28-19
>
3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:53:22 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) GENERAL PROVISIONS, PURPOSE AND POLICY. <br /> <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 1-2 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />activity constitutes a project that is subject to CEQA review, or whether the activity is exempt <br />from CEQA. <br />1.04 REDUCING DELAY AND PAPERWORK. <br />The State CEQA Guidelines encourage local governmental agencies to reduce delay and <br />paperwork by, among other things: <br />(a) Integrating the CEQA process into early planning review; to this end, the project approval <br />process and these procedures, to the maximum extent feasible, are to run concurrently, not <br />consecutively; <br />(b) Identifying projects which fit within categorical or other exemptions and are therefore <br />exempt from CEQA processing; <br />(c) Using initial studies to identify significant environmental issues and to narrow the scope <br />of Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs); <br />(d) Using a Negative Declaration when a project, not otherwise exempt, will not have a <br />significant effect on the environment; <br />(e) Consulting with state and local responsible agencies before and during the preparation of <br />an EIR so that the document will meet the needs of all the agencies which will use it; <br />(f) Allowing applicants to revise projects to eliminate possible significant effects on the <br />environment, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a Negative Declaration rather than <br />an EIR; <br />(g) Integrating CEQA requirements with other environmental review and consultation <br />requirements; <br />(h) Emphasizing consultation before an EIR is prepared, rather than submitting adverse <br />comments on a completed document; <br />(i) Combining environmental documents with other documents, such as general plans; <br />(j) Eliminating repetitive discussions of the same issues by using EIRs on programs, policies <br />or plans and tiering from statements of broad scope to those of narrower scope; <br />(k) Reducing the length of EIRs by means such as setting appropriate page limits; <br />(l) Preparing analytic, rather than encyclopedic EIRs; <br />(m) Mentioning insignificant issues only briefly; <br />(n) Writing EIRs in plain language; <br />(o) Following a clear format for EIRs; <br />(p) Emphasizing the portions of the EIR that are useful to decision-makers and the public and <br />reducing emphasis on background material; <br />(q) Incorporating information by reference; and <br />(r) Making comments on EIRs as specific as possible. <br />1.05 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. <br />These Local Guidelines are intended to implement the provisions of CEQA and the State <br />CEQA Guidelines, and the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines shall be fully <br />complied with even though they may not be set forth or referred to herein.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.