My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
05-28-19
>
3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:53:22 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) GENERAL PROVISIONS, PURPOSE AND POLICY. <br /> <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 1-4 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />1.10 TIME OF PREPARATION <br />Before granting any approval of a project subject to CEQA, the Lead Agency or <br />Responsible Agency shall consider a Final EIR, Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration, or another document authorized by the State CEQA Guidelines to be used in the place <br />of an EIR or Negative Declaration. <br /> <br />Choosing the precise time for CEQA compliance involves a balancing of competing <br />factors. EIRs, Negative Declarations, and Mitigated Negative Declarations should be prepared as <br />early as feasible in the planning process to enable environmental considerations to influence <br />project program and design and yet late enough to provide meaningful information for <br />environmental assessment. <br /> <br />With public projects, at the earliest feasible time, project sponsors shall incorporate <br />environmental considerations into project conceptualization, design, and planning. CEQA <br />compliance should be completed prior to acquisition of a site for a public project. <br /> <br />To implement the above principles, the City shall not undertake actions concerning the <br />proposed public project that would have a significant adverse effect or limit the choice of <br />alternatives or mitigation measures, before completion of CEQA compliance. For example, the <br />City shall not: <br /> <br />(A) Formally make a decision to proceed with the use of a site for facilities which would <br />require CEQA review, regardless of whether the City has made any final purchase of the <br />site for these facilities, except that the City may designate a preferred site for CEQA review <br />and may enter into land acquisition agreements when the City has conditioned its future <br />use of the site on CEQA compliance. <br /> <br />(B) Otherwise take any action that gives impetus to a planned or foreseeable project in a <br />manner that forecloses alternatives or mitigation measures that would ordinarily be part of <br />CEQA review of that public project. <br /> <br />With private projects, the City shall encourage the project proponent to incorporate <br />environmental considerations into project conceptualization, design, and planning at the earliest <br />feasible time. <br /> <br />While mere interest in, or inclination to support, a project does not constitute approval, a <br />public agency entering into preliminary agreements regarding a project prior to approval shall not, <br />as a practical matter, commit the agency to the project. For example, the City shall not grant any <br />vested development entitlements prior to compliance with CEQA. Further, any such pre-approval <br />agreement should, for example: <br /> <br />(A) Condition the agreement on compliance with CEQA; <br />(B) Not bind any party, or commit to any definite course of action, prior to CEQA <br />compliance; <br />(C) Not restrict the Lead Agency from considering any feasible mitigation measures and <br />alternatives, including the “no project” alternative; and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.