My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
05-28-19
>
3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:53:22 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) ACTIVITIES EXEMPT FROM CEQA <br /> <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 3-3 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />The filing of a Notice of Exemption, when appropriate, is recommended for City actions <br />because it starts a 35-day statute of limitations on legal challenges to the City’s determination that <br />the activity is exempt from CEQA. The City is encouraged to make postings of all filed notices <br />available in electronic format on the Internet. These electronic postings are in addition to the <br />procedures required by the State CEQA Guidelines and the Public Resources Code. If a Notice of <br />Exemption is not filed, a 180-day statute of limitations will apply. Please see Local Guidelines <br />Sections 3.13 and 3.17 for certain circumstances in which the Lead Agency is required to file a <br />Notice of Exemption. The thirty-day posting requirement excludes the first day of posting and <br />includes the last day of posting. On the 30th day, the Notice of Exemption must be posted for the <br />entire day. <br />When a request is made for a copy of the Notice prior to the date on which the City <br />determines the project is exempt, the Notice must be mailed, first class postage prepaid, within <br />five (5) days after the City’s determination. If such a request is made following the City’s <br />determination, then the copy should be mailed in the same manner as soon as possible. <br />3.06 DISAPPROVED PROJECTS. <br />Projects that the Lead Agency rejects or disapproves are exempt from CEQA. An applicant <br />shall not be relieved of paying the costs for an EIR, Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration prepared for a project prior to the Lead Agency’s disapproval of the project. <br />3.07 PROJECTS WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT. <br />Where it can be seen with absolute certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in <br />question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is exempt from CEQA. <br />3.08 EMERGENCY PROJECTS. <br />The following types of emergency projects are exempt from CEQA (the term “emergency” <br />is defined in Local Guidelines Section 11.20): <br />(a) Work in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed by the <br />Governor pursuant to Section 8550 of the Government Code. This includes projects that <br />will remove, destroy, or significantly alter a historical resource when that resource <br />represents an imminent threat to the public of bodily harm or of damage to adjacent <br />property or when the project has received a determination by the State Office of Historic <br />Preservation pursuant to Section 5028(b) of the Public Resources Code. <br />(b) Emergency repairs to publicly or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain <br />service essential to the public health, safety or welfare. Emergency repairs include those <br />that require a reasonable amount of planning to address an anticipated emergency. <br />(c) Projects necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency. This does not include long-term <br />projects undertaken for the purpose of preventing or mitigating a situation that has a low <br />probability of occurrence in the short-term, but this exclusion does not apply (i) if the <br />anticipated period of time to conduct an environmental review of such a long-term project <br />would create a risk to public health, safety or welfare, or (ii) if activities (such as fire or <br />catastrophic risk mitigation or modifications to improve facility integrity) are proposed for <br />existing facilities in response to an emergency at a similar existing facility.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.