My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-19_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
05-28-19
>
05-28-19_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:54:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:53:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br /> <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 7-6 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />process shall not be included in the EIR or otherwise disclosed by the lead agency or any other <br />public agency to the public, consistent with Governmental Code Sections 6254(r) and 6254.10, <br />and State CEQA Guidelines 15120(d), without the prior consent of the tribe that provided the <br />information. If the Lead Agency publishes any information submitted by a California Native <br />American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process, that information shall be <br />published in a confidential appendix to the EIR unless the tribe provides consent, in writing, to the <br />disclosure of some or all of the information to the public. This does not prohibit the confidential <br />exchange of the submitted information between public agencies that have lawful jurisdiction over <br />the preparation of the EIR. <br />The exchange of confidential information regarding tribal cultural resources submitted by <br />a California Native American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process among <br />the Lead Agency, the California Native American tribe, the project applicant, or the project <br />applicant's agent is not prohibited by Public Resources Code Section 21082.3. The project <br />applicant and the project applicant's legal advisers must use a reasonable degree of care and <br />maintain the confidentiality of the information exchanged for the purposes of preventing looting, <br />vandalism, or damage to tribal cultural resources and shall not disclose to a third party confidential <br />information regarding the cultural resource unless the California Native American tribe providing <br />the information consents in writing to the public disclosure of such information. <br />Public Resources Code Section 21082.3 does not prevent a Lead Agency or other public <br />agency from describing the information in general terms in the EIR so as to inform the public of <br />the basis of the Lead Agency's or other public agency's decision without breaching the <br />confidentiality required. In addition, a Lead Agency may certify an EIR for a project with a <br />significant impact on an identified tribal cultural resource only if one of the following occurs: <br />(a) The consultation process between the California Native American tribe and the <br />Lead Agency has occurred as provided in Public Resources Code Sections <br />21080.3.1 and 21080.3.2 and concluded pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section <br />21080.3.2. <br />(b) The California Native American tribe has requested consultation pursuant to Public <br />Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 and has failed to provide comments to the Lead <br />Agency, or otherwise failed to engage, in the consultation process. <br />(c) The Lead Agency has complied with subdivision (d) of Section 21080.3.1 of the <br />Public Resources Code and the California Native American tribe has failed to <br />request consultation within 30 days. <br />If substantial evidence demonstrates that a project will cause a significant effect to a tribal <br />cultural resource but the decision-makers do not include the mitigation measures recommended by <br />the staff in the Draft EIR , or if there are no agreed upon mitigation measures at the conclusion of <br />the consultation, or if no consultation has occurred, the Lead Agency must still consider the <br />adoption of feasible mitigation. <br />3 -102
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.