Laserfiche WebLink
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br /> <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 7-11 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />When incorporation by reference is used, the incorporated part of the referenced document <br />shall be briefly summarized, if possible, or briefly described if the data or information cannot be <br />summarized. The relationship between the incorporated document and the EIR, Negative <br />Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be described. When information from an <br />environmental document that has previously been reviewed through the state review system <br />(“State Clearinghouse”) is incorporated by the City, the state identification number of the <br />incorporated document should be included in the summary or text of the EIR. <br />7.17 STANDARDS FOR ADEQUACY OF AN EIR. <br />An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision-makers <br />with information that enables them to make a decision that takes into account the environmental <br />consequences of the project. The evaluation of environmental effects need not be exhaustive, but <br />must be within the scope of what is reasonably feasible. The EIR should be written and presented <br />in such a way that it can be understood by governmental decision-makers and members of the <br />public. A good faith effort at completeness is necessary. The adequacy of an EIR is assessed in <br />terms of what is reasonable in light of factors such as the magnitude of the project at issue, the <br />severity of its likely environmental impacts, and the geographic scope of the project. CEQA does <br />not require a Lead Agency to conduct every test or perform all research, study, and <br />experimentation recommended or demanded by commenters, but CEQA does require the Lead <br />Agency to make a good faith, reasoned response to timely comments raising significant <br />environmental issues. <br />There is no need to unreasonably delay adoption of an EIR in order to include results of <br />studies in progress, even if those studies will shed some additional light on subjects related to the <br />project. <br />7.18 FORM AND CONTENT OF EIR. <br />The text of the EIR should normally be less than 150 pages. For proposals of unusual <br />scope or complexity, the EIR may be longer than 150 pages but should normally be less than 300 <br />pages. The required contents of an EIR are set forth in Sections 15122 through 15132 of the State <br />CEQA Guidelines. In brief, the EIR must contain: <br />(a) A table of contents or an index; <br />(b) A brief summary of the proposed project, including each significant effect with proposed <br />mitigation measures and alternatives, areas of known controversy and issues to be resolved <br />including the choice among alternatives, how to mitigate the significant effects and whether <br />there are any significant and unavoidable impacts (generally, the summary should be less <br />than fifteen (15) pages); <br />(c) A description of the proposed project, including its underlying purpose and a list of permit <br />and other approvals required to implement the project (see Local Guidelines Section 7.24 <br />regarding analysis of future project expansion); <br />(d) A description of the environmental setting, which includes the project’s physical <br />environmental conditions from both a local and regional perspective at the time the Notice <br />of Preparation is published, or if no Notice of Preparation is published, at the time <br />environmental analysis begins. (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125.) This <br />3 -107