Laserfiche WebLink
OCTA <br />May 28, 2019 <br />BOARD CF DIRECTORS <br />Trm $haw <br />Chairman <br />Mr. Jerry C. Guevara <br />Slow Jones <br />Vice Chairman <br />City of Santa Ana Planning Division <br />20 Civic Center Plaza (PO Box 1988) <br />Lisa A. 9ardou <br />Director <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Doug Chaffee <br />Director <br />Subject: 7-Eleven Convenience Store and Service Station Mitigated <br />LdUIVNVies <br />Negative Declaration <br />Direcldr <br />Barbara Deigleize <br />Director <br />Dear Mr. Guevara: <br />Andrew do <br />Director <br />Thank you for providing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) with <br />MichaerkenneSSey <br />direClar <br />the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 7-Eleven Convenience Store and <br />Cons Hemandez <br />Service Station (Project). The following comments are provided for your <br />Director <br />consideration: <br />Jose F. Moreno <br />o+fflct°r <br />+ Please clarify the existing conditions for all Orange County Master Plan of <br />JcaMuffer <br />Arterial Highways (MPAH) facilities within the study area. <br />Director <br />Mark A. Murphy <br />. Raitt Street is planned as a secondary arterial highway (four -lane, <br />Director <br />undivided) on the MPAH, but is currently built as a two-lane facility. Please <br />Director Richard <br />raCt <br />update the Project analysis with an accurate reflection of current and <br />future configurations related to Raitt Street. <br />MiguetPulido <br />Director <br />Michelle Sleet <br />IS/MND, Transportation, Study Area Intersections, on page 102 states <br />Director <br />"Table 15 lists the five key study intersections evaluated in the report in <br />Donald P. Wagner <br />accordance with the scope of work approved by the City of Santa Ana," <br />Director <br />Please clarify why Table 15 shows six key study intersections. <br />Gregory r Winterbottom <br />Director <br />• IS/MND, Transportation, City of Santa Ana LOS and Significance Criteria, <br />Ex-Offieio Member AyanChambe <br />on page 102 states "For signalized intersections that have an existing LOS <br />of F, a project increase of 1 percent of capacity is considered significant." <br />As stated, the City's acceptable level of service is LOS D or better. Are <br />;HfEFEXECUTIVE OFFICE <br />signalized intersections that have an existing LOS of E, with a project <br />Darre0E.Johnson <br />increase of 1 percent of capacity, also considered significant? <br />Chief Executive Officer <br />+ Appendix H, Section 4.3.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic, provides <br />information on future projects in the vicinity of the study area. Please <br />Oral'rWimr Transporration Authority <br />550 South Main Street / P_0. Box 14184 / Qmnge /Califomia 92863-1584 / (714) 560.00TA (6282) <br />