Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2019-xx <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />basis. Conditions of approval have been added to ensure the <br />project remains in compliance with all applicable code and <br />regulations related to 24-hour operations and to mitigate any <br />potential impacts to the general vicinity. <br />5. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan of <br />the city or any specific plan applicable to the area of the proposed <br />use. <br />The proposed project will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan. The project is located in a General Commercial (GC) <br />General Plan land use designation which allows for <br />commercial uses such as retail, service and eating <br />establishments. The project is consistent with several goals <br />and policies of the General Plan, including the Economic <br />Development Element, Land Use Element, and Urban Design <br />Element. Land Use Element Goal 1 promotes a balance of <br />land uses to address basic community needs. Land Use <br />Element Goal 2 promotes land uses that enhance the City’s <br />economic and fiscal viability. Policy 2.8 promotes rehabilitation <br />of commercial properties, and encourages increased levels of <br />capital investment. The convenience store will contribute to <br />the viability of the commercial corridor in which it is located. <br />Policy 2.9 supports developments that create a business <br />environment that is safe and attractive. The property <br />maintenance condition of approval will maintain a safe and <br />attractive environment in the community. Economic <br />Development Element Goal 2 maintains and enhances the <br />diversity of the City’s economic base. Policy 2.3 encourages <br />the development of mutually beneficial and supportive <br />business clusters within the community. Urban Design <br />Element Goal 1 improves the physical appearance of the City <br />through the development of districts that project a sense of <br />place, positive community image and quality environment. <br /> <br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, a <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Review No. 2017-140) and a Mitigation <br />Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared for this project. The Planning <br />Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial <br />Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) and administrative record for the <br />Project, including all oral and written comments received during the comment period. <br />Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council <br />find that the IS/MND contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental <br />impacts associated with the Project, has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and <br />reflects the independent judgment of the City. The Planning Commission further <br />recommends that the City Council find that all environmental impacts of the Project are <br />either less than significant or can be mitigated to a level of less than significant pursuant <br />to the mitigation measures outlined in the IS/MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and <br />1-35