My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - CLOSED SESSION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
08/20/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - CLOSED SESSION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2019 4:50:11 PM
Creation date
8/20/2019 2:21:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Tim Johnson < <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 10:18 AM <br />To: eComment; Iglesias, Cecilia; Solorio, Jose; Penaloza, David; Villegas, Juan; Pulido, Miguel; <br />Sarmiento, Vicente; Ridge, Kristine; rflores@stanta-ana.org <br />Subject: Closed Session Agenda Item 1 B & C <br />City Council and City Manager Ridge ... This email is with regards to the homeless issues in closed session agenda item <br />#1(B) & (C). I thank you for continually addressing homeless issues although I believe that our residents deserve more <br />information from our city. Specifically, I believe that the residents deserve information as follows: <br />1. What the status of the Yale Street shelter that the city and county previously entered a MOU on during <br />2018. <br />2. Has the county violated terms of that MOU? If so, what is the recourse and current course of action? <br />3. What is the status of the lawsuit between the City of Santa Ana and the South County cities? If you recall, <br />the city council previously approved filing a lawsuit against other South County cities for not addressing their <br />homeless crisis and the imbalanced impact that was having on the city of Santa Ana. City council directed legal <br />counsel to prepare that lawsuit but I do not believe it was served upon the defendant cities. The residents <br />deserve to be notified as to the status of that lawsuit and when the defendants will be served and if the city is <br />not going to serve them, provide reasoning for such a decision in a public forum since it was voted upon in a <br />public forum. <br />4. Provide an update as to the SAPD's current course of action with regards to anti -camping ordinance <br />enforcement. Are they currently enforcing anti -camping ordinances? Are they able to enforce considering the <br />occupancy at The Link (i.e. not full)? What are the consequence for violating anti -camping ordinances and do <br />they escalate as a particular individual's number of violations increase? What should the resident's expectations <br />be when calling SAPID or QOLT with regards to timing of a response by PD/QOLT? <br />S. What the residents' expectations should be with regards to encampments and other homeless issues being <br />seen throughout our city? What should our expectations be in terms of enforcement, clearing of visual <br />encampments, and other homeless items in terms of response times, law enforcement action, etc... <br />6. What is the status of the encampments and trash along the Union Pacific Railroad through Santa Ana? I <br />know that it is Union Pacific's responsibility to take care of their own property just like any other property <br />owner. Is Union Pacific cleaning this up? What has the communication been with UP and their representatives <br />as well as their planned response? Is the city fining UP on a daily basis for code enforcement violations? What <br />should the residents' expectations be with regards to the railroad? I have made numerous reports to the UP <br />emergency line by the way ... they indicate that they are aware of the problem yet from my perspective, I am not <br />seeing any action being taken and this is not a good situation for the city, its businesses, or its residents (both <br />housed and unhoused). <br />I am concerned about the city's involvement in the federal lawsuit and the previously discussed proposed Yale homeless <br />shelter. This shelter was discussed in open court before Judge Carter and I am concerned with how the lack of progress <br />on this shelter (or an alternative) may impact the potential settlement. <br />I encourage you to: <br />1. Expand the number of permanent supportive housing (PSH) units in our city. This includes speeding up the <br />planning process for PSH developments and being flexible on parking requirements. I also encourage you to <br />spur the creation of PSH units in other parts of the county. <br />2. Put pressure on the county to expand the availability of mental health beds throughout the county. The <br />facility in Orange being built is not enough although a good step in the right direction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.