Laserfiche WebLink
determines that the Planning Commission's decision was not made in error, that the <br />Planning Commission's decision was not an abuse of discretion by the Planning <br />Commission and that the Planning Commission's decision was supported by substantial <br />evidence in the record. <br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, <br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, <br />demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, <br />equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute <br />resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such <br />other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought <br />against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set <br />aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or <br />any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and <br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or <br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown <br />Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision <br />Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or <br />local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a <br />court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to <br />approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing <br />the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and <br />expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. <br />City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate <br />with Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br />Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana herby denies Appeal <br />Application No. 2019-02, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's approval <br />including the two added conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-12 <br />as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, which approval is <br />fully contingent upon the City Council's consideration and certification of the MND <br />prepared for the project and approval of Amendment Application No. 2019-02. for the <br />project located at 1904 West First Street. This decision is based upon the evidence <br />submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: The Request <br />for City Council Action dated July 16, 2019, and exhibits attached thereto; the Request <br />for Planning Commission Action dated May 13, 2019 and June 10, 2019, and exhibits <br />attached thereto, and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are <br />incorporated herein by this reference. <br />ADOPTED this 16th day of Jam, 2019. <br />Resolution No. 2019-066 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />