RESO 2019-33_402 N EUCLID STREET (SETBACK)

Home Browse Search

15,000 square feet. The subject lot measures 14,859 square feet. The site is deficient in size by 141 square feet, which equates to less than one (1) percent. The lot was legally combined through a voluntary lot merger which combined 402 and 406 North Euclid Street into a more developable lot. Furthermore, developing the lot and applying the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of the zoning code. Requesting that the building provide the necessary side yard setback requirement of 15 feet would drastically reduce the size of the building, thereby making the development of the vacant property unfeasible. 2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The granting of this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. With a limited lot size, denying the Applicant's request to improve the property will deprive the right to construct a commercial building, which is otherwise permitted on other properties within the same vicinity and zone. If the variance is not granted, the property cannot be developed. 3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding properties. The subject lot was legally created through the merging of two separate vacant lots. Each of the previously separate lots would not meet the minimum lot size or street frontage requirements on which to develop a building. The 402 North Euclid Street parcel was approximately 4,778 square feet in size, while the 406 North Euclid Street parcel was approximately 10,081 square feet. The project has been designed to be compatible with the neighboring commercial buildings. Furthermore, special consideration was placed on the design of the lot, building placement, and perimeter walls in order to guarantee that the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the surrounding properties. 4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. Resolution No. 2019-33 Page 2 of 6