My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - CLOSED SESSION 1B
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/01/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - CLOSED SESSION 1B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2019 3:46:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2019 12:20:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
CS-1B
Date
10/1/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 8:N8-cv-00155-D0C-JDE Document 158 Filed 04/26/18 Page 3 of 27 Page ID #:2481 <br />1 Point -in -Time Count and Survey found there were 4,792 homeless individuals in <br />2 Orange County, more than half of whom were unsheltered. <br />3 2. Many of these individuals struggle to meet the basic necessities of <br />4 life, including food, shelter, and health care. They often combat mental illness, <br />5 1 substance abuse issues, physical disabilities, or any combination of these <br />6 afflictions. A significant number are single women and veterans. <br />7 3. Social, mental health, and other services provided to homeless <br />8 individuals by the County of Orange and entities contracting with the County, <br />9 along with their funding levels, are woefully inadequate to address the instant and <br />10 ongoing crisis of homelessness. <br />11 4. The Orange County Board of Supervisors has publicly admitted that it <br />12 has failed to spend tens of millions of dollars available for homeless housing and <br />13 services for the homeless population in the County. <br />14 5. The number of homeless individuals living in Orange County rose <br />15 almost 8% from 2013 to 2017. (See, Exhibit "A".) Nowhere in the County was <br />16 there and is there, a greater concentration of homeless individuals than in the City <br />17 of Santa Ana. <br />18 6. Ultimately, Santa Ana seeks by this Cross -complaint, a fair and <br />19 equitable distribution of responsibilities for homeless services among the County <br />20 and all Orange County cities, as well as reimbursement and sustained funding by <br />21 the County for Santa Ana's decades long efforts to relieve homelessness in Orange <br />22 County. The recent actions of the County and Cross -Defendant cities show that <br />23 such a result is not likely to be voluntarily achieved. <br />24 THE PARTIES <br />25 7. Defendant and Cross -Claimant City of Santa Ana is and at all relevant <br />26 times has been a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing <br />27 under the Constitution and laws of the State of California. <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.