My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4 - SPR19-01; DBA 19-01_114 117 E 5TH STREET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
09-23-19
>
4 - SPR19-01; DBA 19-01_114 117 E 5TH STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2019 10:41:26 AM
Creation date
10/10/2019 10:39:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 2019-xx <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />SECTION 3. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including <br />but not limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the Planning Commission finds <br />that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject <br />property, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section <br />21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental <br />review have occurred, because: <br />(a) The proposed development does not constitute a substantial change that <br />would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the <br />severity of previously identified significant effects. <br />(b) There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under <br />which the proposed development will be developed that would require <br />major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />previously identified significant effects. <br />(c) New information of substantial importance has not been presented that <br />was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of <br />reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, <br />showing any of the following: (i) that the modifications would have one or <br />more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental <br />documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be <br />substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental <br />documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously <br />found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially <br />reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt <br />such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would substantially <br />reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the <br />applicant declined to adopt. <br />SECTION 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds that mitigation measures <br />identified in the 2010 EIR remain applicable to the Transit Zoning Code. These findings <br />are laid out more specifically in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program <br />(“MMRP”) attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Planning Commission therefore hereby <br />re-adopts those mitigation measures identified as remaining applicable to the Transit <br />Zoning Code, through the MMRP attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. <br />SECTION 5. The Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the 2019 <br />Addendum, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. <br />SECTION 6. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, <br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all <br />4-15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.