Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2019-xx <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> Section 2. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold <br />the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any <br />and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings <br />(whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and <br />alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, <br />mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions <br />(collectively “Actions”), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, <br />employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that <br />challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any <br />permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, <br />agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions <br />approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such <br />Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality <br />Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure <br />sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, <br />ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent <br />jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which <br />approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s <br />defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses <br />directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall <br />promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with <br />Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br /> <br /> Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA), the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, <br />and declares as follows: <br />Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not <br />limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the Planning Commission finds <br />that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the <br />subject properties, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources <br />Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring <br />subsequent environmental review have occurred, because: <br /> <br />A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would <br />require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br />the severity of previously identified significant effects. <br /> <br />B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the project will be developed that would require major <br />revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />previously identified significant effects. <br /> <br />4-27