My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2019 12:29:49 PM
Creation date
10/14/2019 12:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />53. Petitioner, Karina Conklin, visited the City Planning Department in person in early <br />July 2019, and specifically inquired as to whether the development at 301 N. Tustin Avenue had <br />changed from the Original Project approved by Respondents to a project involving a car wash. <br />Respondents informed Ms. Conklin that only the 2018 Original Project was before the City, and <br />referred her to the information page for the "Russell Fischer Commercial Center" on the City's <br />website. (See https;//www.sauta-ana.orR/pb/planning-divisionhnalor-Ianning_projects-and- <br />documents/russelI-Fischer-commercial-center). Petitioner Conlin, as a concerned Santa Ana <br />business owner, requested Respondents to inform her if the project changed. Despite Petitioner <br />Conklin's request, Respondents did not include her in the notification list for the August 30th <br />which was distributed only to those within 500 feet of the Revised Project. <br />54. Contrary to the City's representation to Petitioner Conklin, Respondents received <br />new development plans replacing the Retail/Restaurant portion of the project on 301 N. Tustin <br />Avenue with the massive Revised Project on April 26, 2019. Respondents also received payment <br />from Real Party in Interest and applicant Russell Fischer for review of the Revised Project on <br />April 26, 2019. Moreover, Respondents' Planning Department submitted a "Discretionary Action <br />New Submittal" memo to various City departments on May 1, 2019 regarding the newly proposed <br />Revised Project for 301 N. Tustin Avenue. Respondents also received a "Revised Focused Traffic <br />Impact Analysis Report" from Real Parties in Interest for the Revised Project on or about May 17, <br />2019. Respondents' project page for the "Russell Fischer Commercial Center" on the City's <br />website reflected the Original Project until August 29, 2019, when the Revised Project was finally <br />displayed — four months after Respondents received development plans and payment for the <br />22 Revised Project. <br />23 55. Respondents took active measures to conceal the evolution of the project at 301 N. <br />24 Tustin Avenue from the Original Project that, for over three (3) years, had been explained to the <br />25 public, discussed at numerous City meetings and hearings, shown to the public with site plans and <br />26 project mock ups, and displayed on the project page on the city's website as the Russell Fischer <br />27 Commercial Center up until ten (10) days before the September 9t' hearing. Moreover, <br />28 Respondents should have informed Petitioners that the project at 301 N. Tustin Avenue did in fact <br />18 <br />PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.