My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2019 12:29:49 PM
Creation date
10/14/2019 12:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />2 <br />31 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />69. For purposes of CEQA coverage, a "project' is defined as comprising "the whole of <br />an action" that has the potential to result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical <br />I change to the environment. (14 Cal Code Regs § 15378(a).) Thus, the term "project' refers to the <br />I activity for which approval is sought, not to each separate governmental approval that may be <br />for the activity to occur. (14 Cal Code Regs §15378(c).) Accordingly, the lead agency <br />describe the project to encompass the entirety of the activity that is proposed for approval to <br />ensure that all potential impacts of the proposed project will be examined before it is approved. <br />(14 Cal Code Regs § I5378(a), (d).) An initial study that fails to describe the entire project is <br />fatally deficient: "[A] correct determination of the nature and scope of the project is a critical step <br />in complying with the mandates of CEQA." (Nelson v County of Kern (2010) 190 Cal.AppAth <br />252, 267 [county violated CEQA by not including new surface mining as part of project when <br />county was required to approve mining in addition to reclamation plan].) <br />70. In the August 9, 2018 Initial Study completed for the for the Project, Respondents <br />defined the originally proposed project, which was the evaluated for environmental impacts, to <br />include five (5) actions: (1) Development Project Approval for 325 N. Tustin Avenue and 301 N. <br />Tustin Avenue; (2) Conditional Use Permit for drive through services on 301 N. Tustin Avenue; <br />(3) Variance application for reduced landscape setback at 325 N. Tustin Avenue; (4) General Plan <br />Amendment to revise land use designations of two parcels from Professional Administration <br />Office to General Commercial; and (5) Amendment Application to change the zoning of four <br />parcels from Professional to General Commercial (C2). (Initial Study, p. 10.) Respondents <br />described the Original Project as follows: <br />"The proposed project will facilitate the redevelopment of a site with a 2,778-square <br />foot gas station convenience store, a 2,117-square foot gas pump canopy, and a <br />7,417-square foot multi -tenant retail building on two parcels totaling 1.46 acres in <br />the City of Santa Ana. The project also includes a General Plan Amendment to the <br />Land Use Plan Map, an Amendment Application (zone change) to the Zoning Map <br />on two properties of the Tustin Avenue Retail Development Project site (1.46 acres) <br />and three adjacent properties (2.78 acres), which together will be known as the Tustin <br />PETITION FOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.