My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2019 12:29:49 PM
Creation date
10/14/2019 12:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />21 <br />CUP for the car wash on compliance with nothing because, as LSA pointed out, the Noise <br />Ordinance does not have "specific requirements for commercial and medical office uses." (LSA <br />3 11Noise Study, p. 19.) <br />4 95. There will be a significant impact on noise for the surrounding environment, <br />5 including but not limited to, business uses and pedestrian traffic, as there is no specific <br />6 requirement that noise remain below any certain level or comply with any specific standard. <br />7 96. Petitioners' expert conducted a peer review of Real Parties' traffic analysis and <br />8 found it deficient in that it used outdated and incomplete data that, when corrected, would show <br />9 the Revised Project will have a significant impact on traffic, including increasing the collision rate <br />10 at the intersection of N. Tustin Avenue and Fourth Street beyond what it currently is, which is <br />11 significantly higher than would be expected for this type of intersection. Specifically, "[t]he ten <br />12 year average collision rate at this intersection is 0.37 collisions per million entering vehicles ... <br />13 [and] the most recent collision rate during the past three years (2016-2018) the collision rate has <br />14 increased to 0.43 collisions per million entering vehicles." (Id.) Significantly, RKE found that <br />15 "any increase in traffic generated by the proposed [Car Wash] [P]roject could potentially increase <br />16 the collision rate at this intersection." (RK- Engineering, Peer Review of the Revised Project <br />17 revised Traffic Study, dated May 17, 2019, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Appendix B, <br />18 SWITRS data for Intersection of N. Tustin Ave. and 4r' Street.) <br />19 M. The Revised Project does not Qualify for the Infill Exemption <br />20 97. Respondents violated CEQA by erroneously finding the Revised Project <br />21 categorically exempt as an in -fill development project pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA <br />22 Guidelines. <br />23 98. CEQA section 15332 specifies the five requirements for a project to qualify for the <br />24 in -fill development exemption, which are: <br />25 (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation <br />26 and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning <br />27 designation and regulations; <br />28 (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of <br />30 <br />PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.