My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (COMMENT)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2019 12:29:49 PM
Creation date
10/14/2019 12:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures <br />such, the noise generated by construction activities for the proposed project could result in a temporary <br />increase in ambient noise levels of over 5 dBA at uses adjacent to the project site. However, with <br />implementation of mitigation measure MM4.8-1, the construction activities would only occur during the <br />permitted hours designated in the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 18-314(e), and thus would <br />not occur during recognized sleep hours for residences or on days that residents are most sensitive to <br />exterior noise (Sundays and federal holidays). As such, while the physical impact from an increase in <br />ambient noise levels could occur from the construction activities associated with the proposed project, an <br />adverse effect on the nearby residents would not occur. Implementation of mitigation measures <br />MM4.8-2 through MM4.8-4 would also help reduce this impact. Therefore, with mitigation, this impact <br />would be less than significant. <br />Impact 4.8-6 Operation of the proposed project would not result in temporary or <br />periodic increases in ambient noise levels. There would not be a <br />substantial temporary or periodic increase and, thus, this impact would be <br />less than significant. <br />Operation of the proposed project would not include special events or temporary activities which would <br />cause an increase in ambient noise levels. In addition, operation of the proposed project would not <br />require periodic use of special stationary equipment that would expose off -site sensitive receptors to an <br />increase in ambient noise levels above those existing without the proposed project. Therefore, there <br />would be no temporary or periodic noise impacts to on- or off -site receptors due to operation of the <br />proposed project. This impact would be less than sigtzi6cant. <br />Threshold Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise <br />levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />Impact 4.8-7 Operation of the proposed project would not generate increased local <br />traffic volumes that would cause a substantial permanent increase in <br />ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. This is considered a less -than - <br />significant impact. <br />The increase in traffic resulting from implementation of the proposed project would increase the ambient <br />noise levels at sensitive off -site locations in the project vicinity. Traffic was analyzed both for near -term <br />project opening year (2030) and long range (2035) General Plan buildout conditions. Traffic analyzed as <br />part of the 2030 traffic analysis was derived from existing traffic, an ambient growth factor of 0.5 percent <br />per year and the traffic that is anticipated to occur based on known development projects within the <br />vicinity of the study area that will contribute some (or all) of their traffic to the various study area <br />roadways and intersections. Traffic analyzed as part of the 2035 traffic analysis was obtained from the <br />OCTA Traffic Demand model. Previous analysis was conducted by using OCTAM 3.2 travel demand <br />forecasting model. KOA conducted screenline analysis for OCTA's later version model OCTAM 3.3. <br />The screenline analysis surrounding the City indicates that OCTAM 3.3 represents about 11 percent <br />higher traffic volumes forecasting for both the AM and PM peak hour models. KOA therefore applied <br />an 11 percent growth factor to the original OCTAM 3.2 traffic volume forecast. The growth in housing, <br />population, and employment included in the OCP-2004 demographic projections is consistent with the <br />4.8-26 City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) EIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.