My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-090 - Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-090 - Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2019 4:57:37 PM
Creation date
10/23/2019 4:49:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-090
Date
10/15/2019
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
*:/ : 11-1 h WA <br />at this location would be similar to or less than what was projected at the 6th Street Site. Therefore, a mitigation <br />measure has been incorporated to ensure that lighting system to be installed at the park sites perform at similar <br />level as evaluated, and that the light levels along the project boundaries are a close match to the photometric <br />levels identified in Figures 12 and 13. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AE-1, the proposed project <br />would not create substantial light of glare impact that could affect day of nighttime views in the area. Impacts <br />would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br />Mitigation Measure <br />AE-I The City of Santa Ana shall perform field light measurements after the lighting pole <br />installation to demonstrate that actual spill light levels near the adjacent residential units to the <br />west and south are a close match to the levels indicated in the light levels plan shown in Figure <br />12, 6th Street Sik Photometric Plan 1, and Figure 13, 6th Street Site Photometric Plan 2. The light <br />levels shall not exceed 0.8 foot-candle at the habitable residential structure, and luminaires) <br />affixed on the pole shall be shielded and adjusted so that no direct upward beam is permitted. <br />K 1 PWITC] Oki 181111101:14a1 � I Il 161:7 *] i WkYA :1 *9111:Zd V <br />In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies <br />may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the <br />California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. <br />In determining whether impacts to forest fesources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, <br />lead agencies may fefef to mfofmation compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection <br />regarding the states inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Pfoject and the Forest <br />Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols <br />adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project <br />a) Convert Prune Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), <br />as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of <br />the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? <br />No Impact. The replacement park sites are identified as "urban and built-up land" by the Department of <br />Conservation California Important Farmland Finder (DOC 2014). The replacement park sites have been <br />previously developed and are currently vacant. No farmland would be converted to nonagricultural use. No <br />impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? <br />No Impact. The 6th Street Site and the Raitt Street Site are zoned O (Open Space). No agricultural zoning or <br />Williamson Act contract is applicable to the replacement park sites. Implementation of the proposed project <br />would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use. No impact would occur, and no mitigation measures <br />are required. <br />75C-69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.