My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-099 - Denying Appeal Application No. 2019-03
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-099 - Denying Appeal Application No. 2019-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2019 12:01:31 PM
Creation date
10/29/2019 12:01:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-099
Date
10/15/2019
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was categorically exempt from CEQA review as an infill <br />development project. <br />III. Amendment to Variance No. 2018-10 should have been denied <br />because it does not address "special circumstances" that deprive the <br />subject property of privileges enjoyed by similar properties, and instead <br />constitutes an impermissible grant of special privileges. (See SAMC <br />Section 41-638(a)(2); Gov't Code 65906) <br />IV. The notice distributed for the September 9, 2019 Planning <br />Commission public hearing, 10 days before the hearing and only to <br />properties within 500 feet of the project was not reasonably <br />calculated to afford affected persons, like the Conklins, the realistic <br />opportunity to protect their interests. The Conklins were not <br />included on the City's list of individuals/properties to review notice <br />of the hearing. <br />C. On October 15, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo <br />public hearing on Appeal Application No. 2019-03 and found that: <br />I. The required findings for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-30 were made <br />in accordance with Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 (Planning <br />Commission Resolution No. 2019-35) and are as follows: <br />1. That the proposed use will provide a service or facility which will <br />contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or <br />community. <br />The car wash will continue to provide a service to persons that <br />are working or residing in the area. The car wash will replace <br />the existing automated car wash at 325 North Tustin Avenue. <br />The new facility will be bigger than the existing operations and <br />provide vacuum stations for the customers' use. The site will <br />be redeveloped with a new building with a contemporary <br />design with smooth plaster finishes, metal canopies, ceramic <br />tile, and landscaping contributing to the aesthetics of the area. <br />2. That the proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the <br />particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general <br />welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. <br />The proposed car wash will not be detrimental to the health, <br />safety or welfare of those residing or working in the vicinity. <br />The site plan was designed to meet the City's stacking <br />requirements and provides for queuing of approximately 15 <br />vehicles. In addition, the stacking lane was placed at the rear <br />of the site to reduce the chance for overflow vehicular queuing <br />onto any public streets. There are no immediately adjacent <br />nearby residential land uses. The uses immediately adjacent <br />Resolution No. 2019-099 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.