My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
20A - AA- JAG FUNDS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/05/2019
>
20A - AA- JAG FUNDS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 12:52:18 PM
Creation date
10/30/2019 11:39:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Police
Item #
20A
Date
11/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U.S. Department of Justice <br />Office of Justice Programs <br />t t Bureau of Justice Assistance <br />i v <br />PROMCTNUMBER 2018-DJ.BX-0820 <br />award acceptance. <br />AWARD CONTINUATION <br />SHEET <br />Grant <br />AWARD DATE 1/11612018 <br />SPECIAL CONDITIONS <br />PACE 14 OF 23 <br />43. Authority to obligate award funds contingent on noninterference (within the funded "program or activity") with federal <br />law enfomement (8 U.S.C. 1373 and 1644); unallowable costs; notification <br />1. If the recipient is a "State," a local government, or a "public" institution of higher education: <br />A. The recipient may not obligate award funds if, at the time of the obligation, the "program or activity" of the recipient <br />(or of any subrecipient at any tier that is a State, a local government, or a public institution of higher education) that is <br />funded in whole or in part with award funds is subject to any "information -communication restriction." <br />B. In addition, with respect to any project costs it incurs "at risk," the recipient may not obligate award fonds to <br />reimburse itself if -- at the time it incurs such costs -- the program or activity of the recipient (or of any subrecipient <br />at any tier that is a State, a local government, or a public institution of higher education) that would be reimbursed in <br />whole or in part with award funds was subject many infonnationcommunication restriction. <br />C. Any dmwdown of award funds by the recipient shall be considered, for all purposes, to be a material representation <br />by the recipient to OJP that, as of the date the recipient requests the drawdown, the recipient and each subrecipient <br />(regardless of tier) that is a State, local government, or public institution of higher education, is in compliance with the <br />award condition entitled "Noninterference (within the fuaded'program or activity') with federal law enforcement: 8 <br />U.S.C. 1373 and 1644 and ongoing compliance." <br />D. The recipient must promptly notify OR (in writing) if the recipient, fmm its requisite monitoring of compliance <br />with award conditions or otherwise, has credible evidence that indicates that the funded program or activity of the <br />recipient, or of any subrecipient at any tier that is either a State or a local government or a public institution of higher <br />education, may be subject to any information -communication restriction. In addition, any subaward (at any tier) to a <br />subrecipient that is a State, a local government, or a public institution of higher education most require prompt <br />notification to the entity that made the subaward, should the subrecipient have such credible evidence regarding an <br />information -communication restriction. <br />2. Any subaward (at any tier) to a subrecipient that is a State, a local government, or a public institution of higher <br />education must provide that the subrecipient may not obligate award funds if, at the time of the obligation, the program <br />or activity of the subrecipient (or of any further such subrecipient at any tier) that is funded in whole or in part with <br />award funds is subject many information -communication restriction. <br />3. Absent an express written determination by DOJ to the contrary, based upon a finding by DOI of compelling <br />circumstances (e.g., a small amount of award funds obligated by the recipient at the time of a submcipienfs minor and <br />transitory non-compliance, which was unknown to the recipient despite diligent monitoring), any obligations of award <br />funds that, under this condition, may not be made shall be unallowable costs for purposes of this award. In mating any <br />such determination, DOJ will give great weight to evidence submitted by the recipient that demonstrates diligent <br />monitoring of subrecipient compliance with the requirements set out in the "Noninterference ... 8 U.S.C. 1373 and 1644 <br />and ongoing compliance" award condition. <br />4. Rules of Construction <br />A. For purposes of this condition "information -communication restriction" has the meaning set out in the <br />'Noninterference ... 8 U.S.C. 1373 and 1644 and ongoing compliance" condition <br />B. Both the "Rules of Construction" and the "important Note" set out in the "Noninterference ... 8 U.S.C. 1373 and <br />1644 and ongoing compliance" condition are incorporated by reference as though set forth here in fall. <br />OJP FORM 40002 (REV. 4-88) <br />20A-59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.