Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />NOVEMBER 5, 2019 <br />TITLE: <br />APPROVE QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS <br />TO PROVIDE ON -CALL BUILDING <br />SAFETY DIVISION SERVICES FOR A <br />TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $2,400,000 <br />{STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3,31 <br />is/ Kristine Ri <br />CITY MANAGER <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />❑ As Recommended <br />❑ As Amended <br />❑ Ordinance on 111 Reading <br />❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading <br />❑ Implementing Resolution <br />❑ Set Public Hearing For <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements to engage fourteen (14) Building Safety <br />services firms listed below as -needed for a period of three years, starting on November 5, 2019 <br />and ending November 5, 2022, to provide on -call Building Safety Division services which include <br />plan review, technical, and inspection services for the Planning & Building Agency. The services <br />will include plan review, inspection and expedited services with an aggregate amount not to <br />exceed $2,400,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City <br />Attorney. <br />Consultants: <br />41-eaf, Inc <br />Ha er Consultants Incorporated HCI <br />JLee Engineering Inc. <br />Infrastructure Engineers <br />Bebe Group LLC <br />Interwest Consulting Group <br />Building Code Services Inc. <br />Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. SFA <br />Bureau Veritas <br />TRB+Associates <br />Century Structural Engineering Co., Inc (CSE) <br />VCA Code <br />CSG Consultants, Inc (CSG) <br />Willdan <br />DISCUSSION <br />On September 3, 2019, the Request for Qualifications No. 19-085 was released for Building <br />Safety services for plan review, technical studies, and inspections. The intent was to establish a <br />list of qualified consulting firms to be utilized for a period of three years on an as -needed basis. <br />The Building Safety Division received Statement of Qualifications from fourteen (14) firms in <br />response to the Request for Qualifications. The proposals were reviewed for adequacy, <br />evaluated based on the criteria in the RFQ and compiled into a list of qualified firms. Of the <br />25B-1 <br />