My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - WATER AND SEWER RATES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
75A - PH - WATER AND SEWER RATES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:35:23 PM
Creation date
11/12/2019 2:23:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
11/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study <br />Executive Summary <br />This Study used methodologies that are aligned with industry standard practices for rate setting as <br />promulgated by the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the Water Environment Federation <br />(WEF), and all applicable law, including California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6(b) (for water, <br />recycled water, and sewer rates) commonly known as Proposition 218. <br />This Study consisted of the following phases: <br />1. Revenue SufficiencyAnalysis (RSA) —The Study developed multi -year financial forecasting models <br />for the City's Water and Sewer Enterprises to determine the level of annual rate revenue required to <br />satisfy projected annual operating costs, debt service expenses, and capital cost requirements while <br />maintaining adequate financial reserves. In the RSA, the Stantec team evaluated the financial <br />requirements of each Enterprise over a 10-year projection period and made recommendations for rate <br />revenue adjustments over a 5-year period. Input data and key assumptions were reviewed with City staff, <br />and several alternative capital spending scenarios were evaluated by staff during the RSA. This process <br />generated a recommended financial plan and corresponding annual rate increases. While our analysis <br />provides 10-year rate revenue increases, it is recommended that they City conduct an updated analysis in <br />the next 2 — 5 years, as many of the assumptions used in this analysis may change in this time period, <br />which may result in over or under collection of revenues from customers. <br />Like many utilities around the state and country, the City's water and sewer utilities are currently facing <br />challenges of aging infrastructure. According to City Staff, the City's infrastructure is generally in good <br />working condition, however, about 20% of the City's water distribution system has already exceeded the <br />theoretical useful life (some of which date back to before the 1930s). This number is expected to jump to <br />70% by 2040 if no pipe replacements are made. In addition, many of the Water Enterprise's wells, pump <br />stations, and reservoirs have reached the end of their useful service life. The City has completed Water <br />and Sewer Master plans which both recommend a material increase in capital spending to address critical <br />infrastructure repairs. As part of the RSA, multiple capital spending scenarios were considered to <br />balance the need for infrastructure re -investment while limiting the financial impact to utility rate payers. <br />The Study also made recommendation for targeted cash reserves, which is an important component of an <br />enterprise's financial stability and maintaining a strong credit rating. Recommended reserves include an <br />Operating & Maintenance Reserve target equal to 90-days (3 months) of annual operating expenses, an <br />Emergency Reserve set a $4 million (for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises), and a Repair, Renewal, <br />and Replacement (3R) Capital Reserve equal to 50% of average annual projected capital spending. The <br />target levels of the above policies are consistent with 1) the Stantec team's industry experience for similar <br />systems, 2) the findings of reserve studies conducted by the AWWA, and 3) a healthy level of reserves for <br />a municipal utility system per the evaluation criteria published by the municipal utility rating agencies (e.g. <br />Fitch, Moody's, and Standard & Poor's). <br />Due to the different financial needs for the Water and Sewer Enterprises, respectively, this Study is <br />recommending different rate increase schedules for each enterprise. As presented in Table ES-1, rate <br />City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.