Laserfiche WebLink
2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study <br />3. Cost -of -Service Analysis <br />Step 4 - Water <br />For the Water Enterprise, the Potable Water Commodity Costs are distributed across customer classes <br />based on each customer classes' total use of water use of potable water, Recycled Water Commodity <br />Costs are allocated 100% to the recycled water customers, and Utility Costs are allocated to each <br />respective customer class based on their respective number of equivalent meters (see Table 3-12 and <br />Table 3-13). For example, in Step 3 we calculated the revenue requirement for Potable Water <br />Commodity Costs to be $39,339,769 (see Table 3-9). Single Family customers account for 37.34% of the <br />total annual potable water use (see Table 3-12) and therefore are charged for that percentage of the <br />potable water revenue requirement, totaling $14,692,083 (see Table 3-13). <br />Table 3-12: Water Customer Class Units of Service <br />Multi -Family Residential 4,257,723 29.4% 3,713 8.2% 44,254 12,542 14.8% <br />Non -Residential 4,812,323 33.2% 5,672 12.5% 5,672 29,810 35.1% <br />Recycled Water 124,997 NA— 25 0.1% 25 489 0.6% <br />'Values are based off of FY 2018 water use data <br />'-` Recycled water use is not considered in the allocation of retail water use among retail customers. <br />Table 3-13: Water revenue requirement allocation to each customer class <br />Single Family Residential <br />$14,688,232 <br />$10,330,420 <br />$25,018,652 <br />Multi -Family Residential <br />$11,567,253 <br />$3,086,399 <br />$14,653,652 <br />Non -Residential <br />$13,073,974 <br />$7,335,955 <br />$20,409,929 <br />Recycled Water <br />$268,937 $120,276 <br />$389,213 <br />TOTAL: <br />$39.329.459 <br />$268.937 $20.873.051 <br />$60.471.446 <br />Step 4 - Sewer <br />For the Sewer Enterprise, the Account Costs are distributed across customer classes by the proportional <br />number of accounts served by the Sewer Enterprise and Utility Costs are allocated by the percent of the <br />overall adjusted (as explained below) EMS in each customer class (Table 3-14 and Table 3-15). <br />While an EM is a good proxy for the capacity demand of an account on a water utility, the size of the <br />meter is only an indirect measure for sewer use since not all water use returns to the sewer in the same <br />proportion for different types of sewer customers. To account for this difference in sewer usage, a "return - <br />to -sewer" factor is applied to the EM calculation for each customer class (provided by City staff based on <br />their understanding of their customer's water usage). This adjusted EM calculation allows for costs to be <br />allocated to each customer class, respective to their relative demand they may put on the sewer <br />collection system. <br />City of Santa Ana Stantec 124 <br />